From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
      
   >On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go   
   down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one   
   man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and   
   girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal   
   Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying   
   out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been   
   saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK   
   where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along   
   with   
   >>>>>>>>>>> the scenery!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The truth   
   is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides.    
   You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in   
   the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No, stop   
   that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the   
   widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that   
   mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in Great   
   >>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by   
   >>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just because of   
   >>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't say it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It is true, I   
   >>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me your   
   >>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a blind eye   
   >>>>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani and   
   >>>>> other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover it up.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes themselves, if   
   >>>>> that was possible. You can't cover this stuff up forever, but two   
   >>>>> decades of coverup will include a lot of peiple high up in government.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It's far from over after the Epstein files have been released.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's great.  I asked for actual numbers, comparing immigrant rapes   
   >>>> to all rapes.   
   >>>>   
   >>> You are in no position to demand police files of underage victims, Senor!   
   >>>   
   >>> You are part of the coverup by not doing your research. Believe the   
   >>> women! They deserve justice and we demand it!   
   >>   
   >> I demand nothing, except that you support your claims.   
   > >   
   >That's the problem. The coverup. Getting access to the many claims,   
   >testimonies and conviction files.   
   >   
   >Apparently, the Rotherham grooming gang coverup files are as massive as   
   >ten Epstein files!   
   >   
   >"The Rotherham child grooming scandal was a major child protection   
   >failure in England, in which an estimated 1,400 children were sexually   
   >exploited by organized gangs, predominantly of Pakistani heritage,   
   >between 1997 and 2013." - Wiki   
   >   
   >"An independent report by Professor Alexis Jay in 2014 exposed that   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)