From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid   
      
   On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   > On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go   
   down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one   
   man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire   
   impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women   
   and girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their   
   hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal   
   Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying   
   out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this   
   week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been   
   saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a   
   grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK   
   where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along   
   with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the scenery!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The truth   
   is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all   
   sides.  You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there   
   in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by   
   immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No, stop   
   that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the   
   widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that   
   mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to   
   rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in Great   
   >>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by   
   >>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just because   
   of   
   >>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't say it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It is true, I   
   >>>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me your   
   >>>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a blind eye   
   >>>>>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani and   
   >>>>>> other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover it up.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes themselves, if   
   >>>>>> that was possible. You can't cover this stuff up forever, but two   
   >>>>>> decades of coverup will include a lot of peiple high up in government.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It's far from over after the Epstein files have been released.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> That's great.  I asked for actual numbers, comparing immigrant rapes   
   >>>>> to all rapes.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> You are in no position to demand police files of underage victims, Senor!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You are part of the coverup by not doing your research. Believe the   
   >>>> women! They deserve justice and we demand it!   
   >>>   
   >>> I demand nothing, except that you support your claims.   
   >>>   
   >> That's the problem. The coverup. Getting access to the many claims,   
   >> testimonies and conviction files.   
   >>   
   >> Apparently, the Rotherham grooming gang coverup files are as massive as   
   >> ten Epstein files!   
   >>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)