From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid   
      
   On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   > On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   > wrote:   
   >> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go   
   down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one   
   man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire   
   impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women   
   and girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked   
   their hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat   
   criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and   
   carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this   
   week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been   
   saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a   
   grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK   
   where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The   
   truth is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all   
   sides.  You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there   
   in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by   
   immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No,   
   stop that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the   
   widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that   
   mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay   
   or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to   
   rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in   
   Great   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by   
   >>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just   
   because of   
   >>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't say   
   it.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It is true,   
   I   
   >>>>>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me your   
   >>>>>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a blind eye   
   >>>>>>>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani and   
   >>>>>>>> other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover it   
   up.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes themselves,   
   if   
   >>>>>>>> that was possible. You can't cover this stuff up forever, but two   
   >>>>>>>> decades of coverup will include a lot of peiple high up in government.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> It's far from over after the Epstein files have been released.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> That's great.  I asked for actual numbers, comparing immigrant rapes   
   >>>>>>> to all rapes.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You are in no position to demand police files of underage victims,   
   Senor!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You are part of the coverup by not doing your research. Believe the   
   >>>>>> women! They deserve justice and we demand it!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I demand nothing, except that you support your claims.   
   >>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)