From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go   
   down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one   
   man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire   
   impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and   
   girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their   
   hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat   
   criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and   
   carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been   
   saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a   
   grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK   
   where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes   
   along with   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the scenery!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The truth   
   is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all   
   sides.  You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there   
   in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by   
   immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No, stop   
   that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the   
   widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that   
   mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay   
   or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to   
   rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in   
   Great   
   >>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by   
   >>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just because   
   of   
   >>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't say   
   it.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It is true, I   
   >>>>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me your   
   >>>>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a blind eye   
   >>>>>>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani and   
   >>>>>>> other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover it   
   up.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes themselves, if   
   >>>>>>> that was possible. You can't cover this stuff up forever, but two   
   >>>>>>> decades of coverup will include a lot of peiple high up in government.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It's far from over after the Epstein files have been released.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> That's great.  I asked for actual numbers, comparing immigrant rapes   
   >>>>>> to all rapes.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> You are in no position to demand police files of underage victims, Senor!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You are part of the coverup by not doing your research. Believe the   
   >>>>> women! They deserve justice and we demand it!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I demand nothing, except that you support your claims.   
   >>>>   
   >>> That's the problem. The coverup. Getting access to the many claims,   
   >>> testimonies and conviction files.   
   >>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)