home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 155,207 of 155,846   
   Noah Sombrero to All   
   Re: Why was Jim Ratcliffe punished for s   
   14 Feb 26 13:39:03   
   
   From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:26:17 -0500, Noah Sombrero    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:44:33 -0500, Wilson    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will   
   go down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over   
   one man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire   
   impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women   
   and girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of   
   a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their   
   hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the   
   wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat   
   criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and   
   carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this   
   week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been   
   saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a   
   grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the   
   UK where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The   
   truth is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all   
   sides.  You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were   
   there in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by   
   immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No,   
   stop that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the   
   widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that   
   mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to   
   downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to   
   rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in   
   Great   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just   
   because of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't   
   say it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It is   
   true, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me   
   your   
   >>>>>>>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a blind   
   eye   
   >>>>>>>>>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani   
   and   
   >>>>>>>>>> other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover   
   it up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes   
   themselves, if   
   >>>>>>>>>> that was possible. You can't cover this stuff up forever, but two   
   >>>>>>>>>> decades of coverup will include a lot of peiple high up in   
   government.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> It's far from over after the Epstein files have been released.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> That's great.  I asked for actual numbers, comparing immigrant rapes   
   >>>>>>>>> to all rapes.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca