From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/14/2026 10:39 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   > On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:26:17 -0500, Noah Sombrero    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:44:33 -0500, Wilson    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will   
   go down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over   
   one man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire   
   impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s   
   women and girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape   
   of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked   
   their hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the   
   wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat   
   criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and   
   carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction   
   this week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been   
   saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose   
   a grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the   
   UK where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant. The   
   truth is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all   
   sides. You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us. What do we know? That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were   
   there in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants. 1 by   
   immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives? No,   
   stop that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the   
   widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation   
   that mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to   
   downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared   
   to rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in   
   Great   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just   
   because of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't   
   say it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence. It is   
   true, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me   
   your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a blind   
   eye   
   >>>>>>>>>>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani   
   and   
   >>>>>>>>>>> other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover   
   it up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes   
   themselves, if   
   >>>>>>>>>>> that was possible. You can't cover this stuff up forever, but two   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|