home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 155,216 of 155,846   
   Noah Sombrero to Dude   
   Re: Why was Jim Ratcliffe punished for s   
   14 Feb 26 14:28:51   
   
   From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 10:59:29 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
      
   >On 2/14/2026 10:39 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:26:17 -0500, Noah Sombrero    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:44:33 -0500, Wilson    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian <   
   ulianlzb87@gmail.com>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This   
   will go down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over   
   one man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the   
   dire impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s   
   women and girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape   
   of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the   
   word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked   
   their hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the   
   wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat   
   criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and   
   carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this   
   week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have   
   been saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose   
   a grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the   
   UK where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The   
   truth is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all   
   sides.  You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were   
   there in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by   
   immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No,   
   stop that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the   
   widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation   
   that mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to   
   downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs   
   scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared   
   to rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper   
   in Great   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused   
   by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just   
   because of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't   
   say it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It is   
   true, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me   
   your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a   
   blind eye   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani   
   and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover   
   it up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes   
   themselves, if   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca