From: tsm@fastmail.ca   
      
   Wilson  wrote:   
   > On 2/14/2026 2:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 10:59:29 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2/14/2026 10:39 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:26:17 -0500, Noah Sombrero    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:44:33 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This   
   will go down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury   
   over one man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the   
   dire impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s   
   women and girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the   
   rape of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble   
   the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the   
   word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That   
   pricked their hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City,   
   the wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat   
   criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and   
   carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His   
   conviction this week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have   
   been saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders   
   pose a grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of   
   the UK where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’   
   expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.    
   The truth is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk   
   about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all   
   sides.  You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were   
   there in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by   
   immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?    
   No, stop that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by   
   British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting   
   the widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation   
   that mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to   
   downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs   
   scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants,   
   compared to rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper   
   in Great   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were   
   abused by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just   
   because of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian   
   didn't say it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It is   
   true, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed   
   me your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read   
   up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a   
   blind eye   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)