home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      156,682 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 155,225 of 156,682   
   Dude to Noah Sombrero   
   Re: Why was Jim Ratcliffe punished for s   
   14 Feb 26 12:58:25   
   
   From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/14/2026 11:28 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   > On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 10:59:29 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/14/2026 10:39 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:26:17 -0500, Noah Sombrero    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:44:33 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   julianlzb87@gmail.com>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This   
   will go down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury   
   over one man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the   
   dire impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s   
   women and girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape   
   of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the   
   word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked   
   their hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City,   
   the wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat   
   criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and   
   carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction   
   this week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have   
   been saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders   
   pose a grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of   
   the UK where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.    
   The truth is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk   
   about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all   
   sides.  You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were   
   there in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by   
   immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?    
   No, stop that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by   
   British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting   
   the widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation   
   that mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to   
   downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs   
   scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared   
   to rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper   
   in Great   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused   
   by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just   
   because of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't   
   say it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It is   
   true, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me   
   your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a   
   blind eye   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by   
   Pakistani and   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca