home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 155,229 of 155,846   
   Noah Sombrero to All   
   Re: Why was Jim Ratcliffe punished for s   
   14 Feb 26 16:08:06   
   
   From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 20:24:47 -0000 (UTC), Tara    
   wrote:   
      
   >Wilson  wrote:   
   >> On 2/14/2026 2:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 10:59:29 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2/14/2026 10:39 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:26:17 -0500, Noah Sombrero    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:44:33 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This   
   will go down in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury   
   over one man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the   
   dire impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s   
   women and girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the   
   rape of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble   
   the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the   
   word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked   
   their hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City,   
   the wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat   
   criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and   
   carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction   
   this week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have   
   been saying for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders   
   pose a grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of   
   the UK where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.    
   The truth is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk   
   about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from   
   all sides.  You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes   
   were there in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by   
   immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?    
   No, stop that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by   
   British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting   
   the widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation   
   that mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of   
   governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to   
   downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs   
   scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants,   
   compared to rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every   
   newspaper in Great   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were   
   abused by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just   
   because of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian   
   didn't say it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It   
   is true, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed   
   me your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca