From: tsm@fastmail.ca
Dude wrote:
> On 2/14/2026 12:53 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 14:59:19 -0500, Wilson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/14/2026 2:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 10:59:29 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/14/2026 10:39 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:26:17 -0500, Noah Sombrero
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:44:33 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude <
unditster@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This
will go down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digital fury over one man’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the
dire impact
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on
Britain’s women and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> girls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the
rape of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble
the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim
Ratcliffe’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of
the word
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That
pricked their hollow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City,
the wail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old
small-boat criminal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahmad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cul-de-sac last July and carrying out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His
conviction this week
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have
been saying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders pose a grave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of
the UK where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’
expense.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.
The truth is, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk
about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from
all sides. You
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us. What do we know? That will not happen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes
were there in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants. 1
by immigrants?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?
No, stop that,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by
British
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting
the widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and
exploitation that mostly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of
governmental
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to
downplay or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs
scandal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants,
compared to rapes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every
newspaper in Great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were
abused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not
just because of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian
didn't say it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence. It
is true, I
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
