home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 155,241 of 155,846   
   Dude to Tara   
   Re: Why was Jim Ratcliffe punished for s   
   14 Feb 26 17:52:20   
   
   From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/14/2026 1:27 PM, Tara wrote:   
   > Noah Sombrero  wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 20:24:47 -0000 (UTC), Tara    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Wilson  wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/14/2026 2:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 10:59:29 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2/14/2026 10:39 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:26:17 -0500, Noah Sombrero    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:44:33 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude    
   punditster@gmail.com> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape.   
   This will go down   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digital fury over one man’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over   
   the dire impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on   
   Britain’s women and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the   
   rape of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to   
   trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of   
   the word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That   
   pricked their hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White   
   City, the wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old   
   small-boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cul-de-sac last July and carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His   
   conviction this week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country   
   have been saying   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders pose a grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts   
   of the UK where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’   
   expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant   
   rant.  The truth is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk   
   about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from   
   all sides.  You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes   
   were there in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1   
   by immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the   
   natives?  No, stop that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by   
   British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and   
   prosecuting the widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and   
   exploitation that mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations   
   of governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to   
   downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs   
   scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants,   
   compared to rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every   
   newspaper in Great   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were   
   abused by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not   
   just because of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian   
   didn't say it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca