From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 17:52:20 -0800, Dude wrote:   
      
   >On 2/14/2026 1:27 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >> Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 20:24:47 -0000 (UTC), Tara    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2/14/2026 2:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 10:59:29 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2/14/2026 10:39 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:26:17 -0500, Noah Sombrero    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:44:33 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/14/2026 10:32 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:40:48 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 7:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:39:40 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 12:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson <   
   ilson@nowhere.invalid>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude   
    wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape.   
   This will go down   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> digital fury over one man?s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over   
   the dire impact   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on   
   Britain?s women and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> girls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the   
   rape of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to   
   trouble the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim   
   Ratcliffe?s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of   
   the word   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?colonisation? in relation to migrants? That   
   pricked their hollow   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White   
   City, the wail   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Something must be done about this awful man.?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old   
   small-boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahmad   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cul-de-sac last July and carrying out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?extremely horrific sexual offences?. His   
   conviction this week   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country   
   have been saying   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain?s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders pose a grave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts   
   of the UK where   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers?   
   expense.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant   
   rant. The truth is, I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally   
   talk about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from   
   all sides. You   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too us. What do we know? That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes   
   were there in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants. 1   
   by immigrants?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the   
   natives? No, stop that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by   
   British   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and   
   prosecuting the widespread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and   
   exploitation that mostly   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations   
   of governmental   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or   
   to downplay or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs   
   scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants,   
   compared to rapes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by natives.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every   
   newspaper in Great   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were   
   abused by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not   
   just because of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the coverup.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|