From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/14/2026 5:58 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   > On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 17:16:31 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/14/2026 4:25 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>> On 2/14/26 6:10 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 01:26:35 -0800, dart200   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2/13/26 12:02 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:48:59 -0800, dart200   
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2/13/26 8:13 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 07:46:32 -0800, dart200   
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/13/26 6:14 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 21:50:15 -0800, dart200   
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/26 9:05 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 08:31:09 -0800, dart200   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 7:49 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 6:27 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 11:40 AM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “I’m not discouraged at all. I think we’re living a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very important time in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> world. It’s a big shift. It is probably what I would   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call the beginning of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end of the American empire. And it has to come, all the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> empires change, so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now, you know, it’s accelerated, but we are in a very   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good position, because   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have land, we have the best educated people in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> world, you know that,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we have the tolerance that is a great value, we   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have the sharing that does   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not exist in many other countries, we have less very,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very rich people per   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capita, but less very, very poor people too in Canada,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we have the unity,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that we have to fight all the time about that...”   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean Chretien   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feb 2, 2026   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Former and most loved Prime Minister of Canada   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok boomer as if canadians don't depend on us for defense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they just don't pay taxes into that defense   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey little millenial twitt. Ever heard of NATO. We   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fought with you in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Afghanistan and Korea because we are part of NATO yeah.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And what it stood   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for not paying our share to NATO, as well as other   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries, we know   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ya'll spend under the 2% NATO target lol   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> us spends 3.5%, and 35% of the global defense spending. ur   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> welcome ?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> isreal ... spends 8.8%, highest of any country besides   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> ukraine, (and 30%   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> of which comes from the us) lol   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> honestly i could forgive them for 911. but probably only if   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> they'd   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> accept us statehood. 51st state. i'm not sure if this would   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> actually   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> increase their influence over us politics over what they have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> already,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> but at least it would make it a bit more transparent.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> or rather ... first instead i think it's high time to give   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> puerto rico   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> statehood to demonstrate that we're honest about adding more   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> blood into   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> congress and the government tbh. joos can be 52nd ehhh???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> It is up to them. Repeatedly over the years, there have been   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> initiatives in pr to become a state. They have been turned   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> down every   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> time.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly like greenlanders, puerto ricans get to decide.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> actually congress gets to decide in regards to puerto rico   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> If they ask, congress can accept. As it is, you are right,   
   >>>>>>>>>> statehood   
   >>>>>>>>>> for pr is a mess. The most recent referendum did not have an   
   >>>>>>>>>> option   
   >>>>>>>>>> to remain a territory. The options were statehood, or   
   >>>>>>>>>> independence or   
   >>>>>>>>>> a mix sorta. Of those three, you might expect statehood would   
   >>>>>>>>>> win.   
   >>>>>>>>>> But the referendums are not binding. The govt of pr is not   
   >>>>>>>>>> required   
   >>>>>>>>>> to seek statehood based on them. Congress lately has not been   
   >>>>>>>>>> able to   
   >>>>>>>>>> decide what it wants to do. Bills have been introduced to make   
   >>>>>>>>>> pr a   
   >>>>>>>>>> state, but go nowhere.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Himbo has said he would not approve pr statehood because the   
   >>>>>>>>>> mayor of   
   >>>>>>>>>> San Juan was not nice to him. Others too probably. You know   
   what,   
   >>>>>>>>>> pr, why would you want to join this sinking ship anyway?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> clearly nothing that even hints at shaking up the status quo for the   
   >>>>>>>>> better is going to happen while boomers are still in power eh???   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> fuck boomers dude, idk what else to tell ya   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Like women who think the world would be peaceful if only women could   
   >>>>>>>> be in power. They have had a few chances. No peace yet.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> idk ... maybe if we replaced literally *every* leader with a woman it   
   >>>>>>> might be more peaceful. there would likely be other problems, that   
   >>>>>>> might   
   >>>>>>> lead to unsustainability, but it wouldn't be war i don't think   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> iroquois had an interesting system where chiefs were were all men, and   
   >>>>>>> the did all the conflict, negotiation, and diplomacy between   
   >>>>>>> tribes. but   
   >>>>>>> they also had councils of elder women who could replace and select new   
   >>>>>>> chiefs basically on demand as well as managed the tribes   
   >>>>>>> resources/property distribution   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes, great system. It would work well while chiefs and elder women   
   >>>>>> had the well being of the tribes at heart, rather than personal   
   >>>>>> ambitions. Given that kind of leadership, any system can work well.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|