home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 155,340 of 155,846   
   Tara to Noah Sombrero   
   Re: Why was Jim Ratcliffe punished for s   
   16 Feb 26 20:27:15   
   
   From: tsm@fastmail.ca   
      
   Noah Sombrero  wrote:   
   > On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:49:22 -0500, Wilson    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/16/2026 1:39 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:16:48 -0500, Wilson    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2/16/2026 11:12 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:42:33 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2/16/2026 10:30 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:48:30 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/15/2026 4:29 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Feb 15, 2026 at 4:25:11?PM EST, "Noah Sombrero"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Feb 2026 20:22:59 -0000 (UTC), Tara    
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 15, 2026 at 2:37:22?PM EST, "Noah Sombrero"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 15 Feb 2026 19:05:01 -0000 (UTC), Tara    
   >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> I fail to understand the denial that when you bring men from a   
   deeply   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> patriarchal culture where there are high levels of (accepted)   
   gender-based   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> violence against women and dump them in a society where women   
   and girls are   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> ?available?  that this could and will happen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Especially india.  Common but not accepted.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_against_women_in_India   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> You might remember that in canada within the past 10 years or so   
   there   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> was one case of an honor killing of a wife and daughters of a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> pakistani immigrant family.  The father in that case will likely   
   not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ever get out of canadian prison.  He thought they were straying   
   from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> sharia law and so bringing dishonor on him.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that there has been one such case has not meant that   
   there   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> have been multitudes in the minds of canadians.  It did encourage   
   an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> awareness that people from other cultures need to become aware of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> canadian values when they come here.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> We haven't had to deal with anything like the scope they've had   
   happen in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> UK.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Taking julian's article at face value then:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> The indians and pakistanis that come here must be quite similar to   
   >>>>>>>>>> those that go to uk.  It cannot be simply a matter of culture or   
   race   
   >>>>>>>>>> or of hormonal problems.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I don't know   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> It could be the attitude of the people and the police that make a   
   >>>>>>>> difference.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Agreed.  Pervasive criminality is a symptom of a sick society.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If society turns a blind eye to wrongdoing and does not discourage it,   
   >>>>>>>> it is effectively encouraged.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> This is the opposite of the above.  I don't see any blind eyes up   
   >>>>>>> here.  I see absence of accused indian/pakistani inherent behaviors   
   >>>>>>> that manifest elsewhere.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Again you pretend to not understand what I am saying.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Canada does not have the problems of England because they have not   
   >>>>>> turned a blind eye to them and enforces the law. Pervasive criminality   
   >>>>>> grows out of not doing that.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And it has nothing to do with being tolerant as tara says?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Tara's said nothing in this thread regarding Canadian tolerance.   
   >>>   
   >>> Actually she did.  It is there if you want to read it.   
      
      
   I said that Canadians tolerate (and often celebrate) the differences in an   
   immigrant’s culture from ours, we don’t tolerate the imposition of and the   
   breaking of our laws.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You say criminality flourishes when laws are not enforced.  I say   
   >>>>> criminality is a response to how people are treated.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There has been no flood of indian/pakistani criminal behavior to   
   >>>>> respond to.  Although it is very likely that canadian prisons have   
   >>>>> populations of such people proportional to their presence in society.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The apparent lack of widespread criminal behavior by migrants in Canada   
   >>>> could be because they are treated well there. One way to test this is to   
   >>>> determine if they've been treated worse in England.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If England hasn't treated them worse than Canada we have to look for   
   >>>> other reasons.   
   >>>   
   >>> That would be true, if england has treated them as well.  One place to   
   >>> start looking would be the general attitude towards immigrants.  Does   
   >>> julian's article give you some indication of that?   
   >>>   
   >>> What we know is that since it seems unlikely that uk and canada get   
   >>> different indian and pakistani immigrant populations, it can't be a   
   >>> matter of race, culture or hormones.   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It seems to me England has gone out of its way to treat migrants lightly.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> One thing that gets reported from time to time is that blacks are   
   >>>>> highly overpresent in us prisons proportional to their presence in   
   >>>>> society.  I would observe that fact does not seem to be dampening   
   >>>>> black criminality, otherwise black populations would be decreasing in   
   >>>>> prison.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I have no doubt you want to put the blame for that on the inherent   
   >>>>> nature of black people.  Right?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Right?"   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I've never "put the blame" on the inherent nature of any group. In fact   
   >>>> over the years I have repeatedly said that differences in group behavior   
   >>>> are mostly due to cultural influences which vary around the world.   
   >>>   
   >>> We are talking about prison populations in the us.   
   >>>   
   >>>> So you're wildly misrepresenting what I believe.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> One thing that a person might notice about prison, is that criminals   
   >>>>> plan to get away with it.  So the prospect of prison is not going to   
   >>>>> be a big deterrent.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What people think about their chances of getting away with their crime   
   >>>> is not the only reason for holding criminals accountable.   
   >>>   
   >>> It has nothing to do with holding people accountable.  It has to do   
   >>> with why incarceration does not prevent crime.   
   >>>   
   >>>> If nothing   
   >>>> else, prison removes the offender from society so they cannot continue   
   >>>> harming the general public for a time.   
   >>>   
   >>> As if that should be the goal in dealing with those people.  Why put   
   >>> criminals in a situation where they can learn to be more effective   
   >>> criminals?   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I fundamentally disagree with many things you believe even if it seems   
   >>>>> to you that you do not believe such things.  That does not mean I use   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca