From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 10:22:52 -0800, Dude wrote:   
      
   >On 2/18/2026 10:00 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 17:35:05 -0000 (UTC), Tara    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Feb 18, 2026 at 12:00:59?PM EST, "Noah Sombrero" wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 16:54:09 -0000 (UTC), Tara    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Feb 18, 2026 at 11:31:04?AM EST, "Noah Sombrero"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:15:57 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2/18/2026 11:07 AM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 2026 at 11:00:04?AM EST, "Wilson"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2026 10:36 AM, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2026 15:28, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/17/2026 6:20 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2026 at 4:24:25?PM EST, "Julian"    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I?ve got a new thriller out this week, under my pen name of S.K.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tremayne. I am pleased with the book, and I believe it?s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> entertaining. I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> am also aware that, in a tough and competitive market, that may   
   not be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough for it to succeed. I am even more aware that readers   
   might   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the book is dreck. They might give me one star reviews, and no   
   sales.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then the book will crater, my publishers will probably abandon   
   me, and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my nice career will drift to an end.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that, of course, is how it should be. No one in any career   
   is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitled to a free ride. That especially applies to people who   
   get   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a desirable, creative job such as novel writing. Whether you?re   
   a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> writer, actor, director, sculptor or musician ? if you want that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> enviably fun creative profession, you live and die by public   
   approval;   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you are bad, goodbye.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless, of course, you are an architect. I was reminded of this   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> peculiar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> anomaly by last week?s furore over the latest architectural   
   wart to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> attach itself to London?s battered face: the already notorious   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Belgrove   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> House?, that now dominates a prime corner of Euston Road, where   
   it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sits   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right next to King?s Cross and St Pancras.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I presume it has been situated in London after the original   
   design was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rejected by a horrified Uzbek government, as being too ugly for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tashkent.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have not seen it yet, the best way to get a sense is to   
   look at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> photos like the one here.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://x.com/ianvisits/status/2020440287785443433   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Briefly. The second best way is for me to describe it, but that   
   is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually quite hard. Because it?s difficult to verbally capture   
   this   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> weird, stupid and meaningless collision of styles, materials,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dimensions. The closest visual analogy, to my mind, is one of   
   those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> plates piled high at a hotel buffet by an idiot: with a splodge   
   of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> curry, some sauerkraut, five potatoes, some lemon pie, a lamb   
   cutlet,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoked herring, and several cheesy crackers, and everything   
   banal and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasteless even before you smush them together.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In short, the building is appalling, and it?s not going to get   
   better   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> over time. It is a dud. A turkey. A calamitous flop. It is the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Millennium Dome. It is Fyre Festival. It is Triangle, the BBC   
   soap   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opera   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> set on a North Sea ferry route. It is Raise the Titanic. It is   
   Harry   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hill?s I Can?t Sing. It is Keir Starmer?s prime ministerial   
   career,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendered in concrete and plastic. It is my first novel, Absent   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fathers,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which got a cheque for zero pounds zero pence, as a computer   
   could not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe an author could sell so few copies, so sent a cheque   
   anyway.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally, it is the architectural equivalent of Via Galactica   
   (1972), a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> space-themed musical with actors on trampolines, which lasted   
   seven   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> performances.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But here?s the thing. For all the creative disasters listed   
   above,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone responsible paid a price. Even the lavishly coddled   
   Millennium   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dome project damaged careers. And yet, if you design and erect a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hideous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> building, equivalent to these aesthetic catastrophes, you pay   
   no price   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at all. And this despite the fact that, unlike a rubbish novel,   
   you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can?t chuck a bad building in a bin. No, the building squats   
   there,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> decades, blighting the lives of everyone who must look at it.   
   And   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> given   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this particular building is situated in one of the most   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conspicuous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sites in the capital, opposite two of its grandest railway   
   stations,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is going to be a lot of people.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Worse, there?s a decent chance the architects of this carbuncle   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will get   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an award. Because that?s what they do in architecture world.   
   They have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hideous ideas, then they force them on the rest of us, and then   
   they   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> give each other prizes. Until, about 40 years down the line,   
   everyone   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> accepts the obvious truth, and the pile of ugliness is finally   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> demolished.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you need proof, just look at the lists. Salford?s laughable   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Centenary   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Building, Britain?s very first Stirling Prize winner (in 1996),   
   was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> set   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be knocked down just 30 years later, to much applause. The   
   Tricorn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Centre Portsmouth won the Civic Trust award in 1967 and yet was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> demolished in 2004. Pimlico Comprehensive School collected a   
   RIBA   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prize,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then it was flattened in despair. Gateshead?s Trinity Square   
   car park   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was recognised as a ?most outstanding modernist building? by   
   the 20th   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> century society after it was blasted to hell. Add to this, our   
   own   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|