home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      156,682 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 155,435 of 156,682   
   Julian to Tara   
   Re: We need a way to punish architects (   
   18 Feb 26 23:06:15   
   
   From: julianlzb87@gmail.com   
      
   On 18/02/2026 22:46, Tara wrote:   
   > Julian  wrote:   
   >> On 18/02/2026 22:14, Tara wrote:   
   >>> Julian  wrote:   
   >>>> On 18/02/2026 21:43, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>> Julian  wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 18/02/2026 16:39, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Feb 18, 2026 at 11:15:57 AM EST, "Wilson"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/18/2026 11:07 AM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 2026 at 11:00:04 AM EST, "Wilson"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2026 10:36 AM, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2026 15:28, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/17/2026 6:20 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tara  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2026 at 4:24:25 PM EST, "Julian"    
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve got a new thriller out this week, under my pen name of   
   S.K.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tremayne. I am pleased with the book, and I believe it’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entertaining. I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am also aware that, in a tough and competitive market, that   
   may not be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough for it to succeed. I am even more aware that readers   
   might   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the book is dreck. They might give me one star reviews, and no   
   sales.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then the book will crater, my publishers will probably abandon   
   me, and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my nice career will drift to an end.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that, of course, is how it should be. No one in any career   
   is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitled to a free ride. That especially applies to people who   
   get   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a desirable, creative job such as novel writing. Whether   
   you’re a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writer, actor, director, sculptor or musician – if you want   
   that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enviably fun creative profession, you live and die by public   
   approval;   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you are bad, goodbye.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless, of course, you are an architect. I was reminded of this   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peculiar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anomaly by last week’s furore over the latest architectural   
   wart to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attach itself to London’s battered face: the already   
   notorious   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Belgrove   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> House’, that now dominates a prime corner of Euston Road,   
   where it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sits   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right next to King’s Cross and St Pancras.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I presume it has been situated in London after the original   
   design was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rejected by a horrified Uzbek government, as being too ugly for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tashkent.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have not seen it yet, the best way to get a sense is to   
   look at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> photos like the one here.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://x.com/ianvisits/status/2020440287785443433   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Briefly. The second best way is for me to describe it, but   
   that is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually quite hard. Because it’s difficult to verbally   
   capture this   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weird, stupid and meaningless collision of styles, materials,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dimensions. The closest visual analogy, to my mind, is one of   
   those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plates piled high at a hotel buffet by an idiot: with a   
   splodge of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curry, some sauerkraut, five potatoes, some lemon pie, a lamb   
   cutlet,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoked herring, and several cheesy crackers, and everything   
   banal and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasteless even before you smush them together.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In short, the building is appalling, and it’s not going to   
   get better   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over time. It is a dud. A turkey. A calamitous flop. It is the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Millennium Dome. It is Fyre Festival. It is Triangle, the BBC   
   soap   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opera   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set on a North Sea ferry route. It is Raise the Titanic. It is   
   Harry   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hill’s I Can’t Sing. It is Keir Starmer’s prime   
   ministerial career,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendered in concrete and plastic. It is my first novel, Absent   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fathers,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which got a cheque for zero pounds zero pence, as a computer   
   could not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe an author could sell so few copies, so sent a cheque   
   anyway.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally, it is the architectural equivalent of Via Galactica   
   (1972), a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space-themed musical with actors on trampolines, which lasted   
   seven   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performances.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But here’s the thing. For all the creative disasters listed   
   above,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone responsible paid a price. Even the lavishly coddled   
   Millennium   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dome project damaged careers. And yet, if you design and erect   
   a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hideous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building, equivalent to these aesthetic catastrophes, you pay   
   no price   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at all. And this despite the fact that, unlike a rubbish   
   novel, you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can’t chuck a bad building in a bin. No, the building squats   
   there,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decades, blighting the lives of everyone who must look at it.   
   And   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this particular building is situated in one of the most   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conspicuous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sites in the capital, opposite two of its grandest railway   
   stations,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is going to be a lot of people.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Worse, there’s a decent chance the architects of this   
   carbuncle   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will get   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an award. Because that’s what they do in architecture world.   
   They have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hideous ideas, then they force them on the rest of us, and   
   then they   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give each other prizes. Until, about 40 years down the line,   
   everyone   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accepts the obvious truth, and the pile of ugliness is finally   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demolished.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you need proof, just look at the lists. Salford’s   
   laughable   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Centenary   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Building, Britain’s very first Stirling Prize winner (in   
   1996), was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be knocked down just 30 years later, to much applause. The   
   Tricorn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Centre Portsmouth won the Civic Trust award in 1967 and yet was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demolished in 2004. Pimlico Comprehensive School collected a   
   RIBA   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prize,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then it was flattened in despair. Gateshead’s Trinity Square   
   car park   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was recognised as a ‘most outstanding modernist building’   
   by the 20th   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> century society after it was blasted to hell. Add to this, our   
   own   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca