From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/18/2026 5:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   > On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 16:01:13 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/18/2026 3:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 12:25:30 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2/18/2026 10:45 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 10:22:52 -0800, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2/18/2026 10:00 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 17:35:05 -0000 (UTC), Tara    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 2026 at 12:00:59?PM EST, "Noah Sombrero"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 16:54:09 -0000 (UTC), Tara    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 2026 at 11:31:04?AM EST, "Noah Sombrero"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:15:57 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2026 11:07 AM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 2026 at 11:00:04?AM EST, "Wilson" wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2026 10:36 AM, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/02/2026 15:28, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/17/2026 6:20 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2026 at 4:24:25?PM EST, "Julian" <   
   ulianlzb87@gmail.com>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I?ve got a new thriller out this week, under my pen name   
   of S.K.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tremayne. I am pleased with the book, and I believe it?s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entertaining. I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am also aware that, in a tough and competitive market,   
   that may not be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough for it to succeed. I am even more aware that   
   readers might   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the book is dreck. They might give me one star reviews,   
   and no sales.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then the book will crater, my publishers will probably   
   abandon me, and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my nice career will drift to an end.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that, of course, is how it should be. No one in any   
   career is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitled to a free ride. That especially applies to people   
   who get   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a desirable, creative job such as novel writing. Whether   
   you?re a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writer, actor, director, sculptor or musician ? if you   
   want that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enviably fun creative profession, you live and die by   
   public approval;   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you are bad, goodbye.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless, of course, you are an architect. I was reminded of   
   this   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peculiar   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anomaly by last week?s furore over the latest   
   architectural wart to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attach itself to London?s battered face: the already   
   notorious   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Belgrove   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> House?, that now dominates a prime corner of Euston Road,   
   where it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sits   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right next to King?s Cross and St Pancras.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I presume it has been situated in London after the   
   original design was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rejected by a horrified Uzbek government, as being too   
   ugly for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tashkent.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have not seen it yet, the best way to get a sense   
   is to look at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> photos like the one here.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://x.com/ianvisits/status/2020440287785443433   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Briefly. The second best way is for me to describe it, but   
   that is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually quite hard. Because it?s difficult to verbally   
   capture this   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weird, stupid and meaningless collision of styles,   
   materials,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dimensions. The closest visual analogy, to my mind, is one   
   of those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plates piled high at a hotel buffet by an idiot: with a   
   splodge of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curry, some sauerkraut, five potatoes, some lemon pie, a   
   lamb cutlet,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoked herring, and several cheesy crackers, and   
   everything banal and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasteless even before you smush them together.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In short, the building is appalling, and it?s not going to   
   get better   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over time. It is a dud. A turkey. A calamitous flop. It is   
   the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Millennium Dome. It is Fyre Festival. It is Triangle, the   
   BBC soap   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opera   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set on a North Sea ferry route. It is Raise the Titanic.   
   It is Harry   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hill?s I Can?t Sing. It is Keir Starmer?s prime   
   ministerial career,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendered in concrete and plastic. It is my first novel,   
   Absent   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fathers,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which got a cheque for zero pounds zero pence, as a   
   computer could not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe an author could sell so few copies, so sent a   
   cheque anyway.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally, it is the architectural equivalent of Via   
   Galactica (1972), a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space-themed musical with actors on trampolines, which   
   lasted seven   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performances.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But here?s the thing. For all the creative disasters   
   listed above,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone responsible paid a price. Even the lavishly   
   coddled Millennium   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dome project damaged careers. And yet, if you design and   
   erect a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hideous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building, equivalent to these aesthetic catastrophes, you   
   pay no price   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at all. And this despite the fact that, unlike a rubbish   
   novel, you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can?t chuck a bad building in a bin. No, the building   
   squats there,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decades, blighting the lives of everyone who must look at   
   it. And   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this particular building is situated in one of the   
   most   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conspicuous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sites in the capital, opposite two of its grandest railway   
   stations,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is going to be a lot of people.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Worse, there?s a decent chance the architects of this   
   carbuncle   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will get   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an award. Because that?s what they do in architecture   
   world. They have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hideous ideas, then they force them on the rest of us, and   
   then they   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give each other prizes. Until, about 40 years down the   
   line, everyone   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|