From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 18:16:42 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
      
   >On 2/20/2026 2:08 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 13:26:33 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2/20/2026 11:09 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:41:05 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2/20/2026 8:10 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2/19/2026 9:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 2/19/2026 2:48 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:13:43 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> There are no known emails between any Epstein masseuses and Andrew.   
   >>>>>>>>> Maybe you made that up.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> They are investigating him for revealing state secrets to epstein.   
   >>>>>>>> Andy is simply another one of those pals of a sex trafficor with no   
   >>>>>>>> known trafficees.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So, I have not thought this through, or even thought about it very   
   >>>>>>> much, but Andy has to be a scapegoat right? I don't see how it could   
   >>>>>>> be just the one of them that's part of all this.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It's an obvious sex ring conspiracy. And, what's worse, a coverup. A   
   >>>>>>> coverup, up to and including his mother, the Queen of England who   
   >>>>>>> obviously covered for the Prince.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It's certainly possible the Queen knew about Andrew. But she seemed a   
   >>>>>> sweet old lady and was an exceptional person all her life. So I'll   
   >>>>>> continue to prefer to believe that she didn't know.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> After thinking it over, I'm thinking this whole Jeffrey Epstein sex ring   
   >>>>> conspiracy theory is a hoax. Why?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Red flag.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There's no evidence that anyone did anything. There's a few photos - one   
   >>>>> a photographed encounter at a London townhouse before going to a   
   nightclub.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And so it is that the sex trafficker had no clients.  You buy that?   
   >>>>   
   >>> It looks like you've made that up. There's no charges and no evidence.   
   >>   
   >> There is however a conviction of epstein.   
   > >   
   >Let's be clear.   
   >   
   >In 2009, Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to two counts of solicitation of   
   >prostitution, which included one count involving a minor.   
   > >   
   > > Sex trafficking with no visible clients.>   
   >The FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn't running a sex trafficking ring.   
      
   You conveniently continue to ignore subsequent prosecution which   
   motivated him to commit suicide.   
      
   >>>   
   >>> Maybe you have not thought this through. Some single men like girls;   
   >>> some men like them on the younger side. Some men prefer hookers. Some   
   >>> men go on dates to clubs to meet girls. You have a right to   
   >>> companionship in an open society.   
   >>>   
   >>> Apparently, in Canada the age of consent to sexual activity is 16 years.   
   >>>   
   >>> So, I've never heard of a paid masseuse, male or female, flying on the   
   >>> Lolita express, over to a private island and going inside a pleasure   
   >>> dome - just for sight seeing or small talk. YMMV.   
   --   
   Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain   
   Don't get political with me young man   
   or I'll tie you to a railroad track and   
   <<>> to <<>>   
   Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?   
   dares: Ned   
   does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)