From: fedora@fea.st
On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 18:03:37 -0800, Dude wrote:
>On 2/20/2026 2:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:50:07 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/20/2026 12:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 12:21:59 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/19/2026 7:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 18:47:55 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/19/2026 4:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:01:22 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2026 2:45 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:09:47 -0800, Dude
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2026 1:44 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:38:57 -0800, Dude
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2026 12:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 12:39:03 -0800, Dude
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2026 7:40 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:35:08 +0000, Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a union thug and his cabal of communist academics have
awoken a sleeping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> giant: behold, your first look at the billionaire
counterattack in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> war for California’s future
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There you have it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key words: Economic Impact
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What happened to the labor movement?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure you've thought this through.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are now thugs and a cabal of communist academics.>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Critics, argue it could negatively impact working people and
that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> top 1% already pay nearly half of the state's income taxes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And so it is that the labor movement has become thugs and a
cabal of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> communist academics. Nah, you can't fool me with that shit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's because you have not thought this through. Otherwise, you
would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have posted your arguments, pro or con, to this list, instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> infantile emotional outbursts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nah, I simply reject any premise that ends up with
>>>>>>>>>>>> labor movement has become thugs and a cabal of
>>>>>>>>>>>> communist academics
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously, you've not read any California labor union history, or
even
>>>>>>>>>>> thought about it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> California Teamsters were often labeled "thugs" and "commies" due
to a
>>>>>>>>>>> combination of violent, coercive strike tactics, deeply ingrained
>>>>>>>>>>> corruption.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The union used intimidation, engaged in mafia-related corruption
notably
>>>>>>>>>>> under Jimmy Hoffa. Remember him?s.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Right, he disappeared something like 65 years ago. Time to give
labor
>>>>>>>>>> unions a break.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the record, I am anti-union and support your right to work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Right to work. Another mis-naming of something to hide what it is
>>>>>>>> really about.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have a right to work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me be clear: People have individual freedom to work by preventing
>>>>>>> forced association with unions or collecting mandatory dues from
>>>>>>> workers. You have a right to work without being forced to pay union
dues
>>>>>>> and/or join a union in order to work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Total shapeshifter. Instead of my right to work, this is really about
>>>>>> employers right to bust unions. Which is where we are right now. Some
>>>>>> people with special skills have unions. The rest of us nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Let me be clear: Employers have the inherent right to bust any union
>>>>> conspiracy that is taking away the right of workers to work. Tear them
up!
>>>>>
>>>>> U.S. states with right-to-work laws:
>>>>>
>>>>> As of May 2024, the following 26 states have right-to-work laws. - Wiki
>>>>
>>>> Shapeshifter.
>>>>
>>> Let me be clear: You have obviously not thought this through.
>>>
>>> You have the right to work without discrimination. The Union does not
>>> have the right to charge mandatory dues to give to political parties if
>>> you refuse to join the union in order to work.
>>
>> That is your opinion.
> >
>Just follow the law.
Simply follow your conscience if you have one.
>> My opinion is that employers do not have the right to bust unions.
> >
>The Right-to-work (RTW) laws in the U.S. are state-level regulations.
>
>They were authorized by the 1947 federal Taft-Hartley Act.
None of which makes such laws the right thing to do.
>It is illegal to prohibit unions from requiring employees to pay dues or
>fees as a condition of employment.
> >
> > Even though they do that to whatever extent they can manage.>
>The question is, why do some people not want unions?
No telling why some people want the things they want.
>
>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/yhyerzsa
>>>>>
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
