From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/21/2026 2:32 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 12:27:14 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/20/2026 7:23 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 18:16:42 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2/20/2026 2:08 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 13:26:33 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2/20/2026 11:09 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:41:05 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/20/2026 8:10 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2026 9:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2026 2:48 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:13:43 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> There are no known emails between any Epstein masseuses and   
   Andrew.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you made that up.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> They are investigating him for revealing state secrets to epstein.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Andy is simply another one of those pals of a sex trafficor with no   
   >>>>>>>>>>> known trafficees.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> So, I have not thought this through, or even thought about it very   
   >>>>>>>>>> much, but Andy has to be a scapegoat right? I don't see how it could   
   >>>>>>>>>> be just the one of them that's part of all this.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> It's an obvious sex ring conspiracy. And, what's worse, a coverup. A   
   >>>>>>>>>> coverup, up to and including his mother, the Queen of England who   
   >>>>>>>>>> obviously covered for the Prince.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> It's certainly possible the Queen knew about Andrew. But she seemed a   
   >>>>>>>>> sweet old lady and was an exceptional person all her life. So I'll   
   >>>>>>>>> continue to prefer to believe that she didn't know.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> After thinking it over, I'm thinking this whole Jeffrey Epstein sex   
   ring   
   >>>>>>>> conspiracy theory is a hoax. Why?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Red flag.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> There's no evidence that anyone did anything. There's a few photos -   
   one   
   >>>>>>>> a photographed encounter at a London townhouse before going to a   
   nightclub.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And so it is that the sex trafficker had no clients.  You buy that?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It looks like you've made that up. There's no charges and no evidence.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> There is however a conviction of epstein.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> Let's be clear.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In 2009, Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to two counts of solicitation of   
   >>>> prostitution, which included one count involving a minor.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Sex trafficking with no visible clients.>   
   >>>> The FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn't running a sex trafficking ring.   
   >>>   
   >>> You conveniently continue to ignore subsequent prosecution which   
   >>> motivated him to commit suicide.   
   >>>   
   >> You convenientlyleft out the FBI report about a client list.   
   >>   
   >> Let's be clear:   
   >>   
   >> On Dec. 30, 2024, about three weeks before President Joe Biden left   
   >> office, then-FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate reached out through   
   >> subordinates to ask "whether our investigation to date indicates the   
   >> 'client list,' often referred to in the media, does or does not exist,"   
   >> according to an email summarizing his query. A day later, an FBI   
   >> official replied that the case agent had confirmed no client list existed.   
   >   
   > So the fbi completely failed to do their job.  Or was somehow   
   > motivated to completely forget about the whole thing.   
   >   
   On Joe Biden's watch.   
    >   
      
   >> Jeffrey Epstein files: Tracing the legal cases that led to   
   >> sex-trafficking charges   
   >> July 25, 2025   
   >>   
   >> https://tinyurl.com/5y7twd3n   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Maybe you have not thought this through. Some single men like girls;   
   >>>>>> some men like them on the younger side. Some men prefer hookers. Some   
   >>>>>> men go on dates to clubs to meet girls. You have a right to   
   >>>>>> companionship in an open society.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Apparently, in Canada the age of consent to sexual activity is 16 years.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So, I've never heard of a paid masseuse, male or female, flying on the   
   >>>>>> Lolita express, over to a private island and going inside a pleasure   
   >>>>>> dome - just for sight seeing or small talk. YMMV.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)