From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   On 2/22/26 11:20 AM, Tara wrote:   
   > Julian  wrote:   
   >> A new study argues that the concept of a “pristine wilderness” that’s   
   >> free from human inhabitants is a failing Eurocentric concept that may be   
   >> used to expand conservation areas, a concern the U.N. special rapporteur   
   >> on human rights and the environment reiterates in a policy brief about   
   >> the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. The displacement of   
   >> Indigenous peoples and local communities from such landscapes for   
   >> conservation purposes may have adverse impacts on the ecosystem’s   
   >> integrity and lead to the degradation of biodiversity...   
   >>   
   >> https://earth.org/pristine-wilderness-without-human-presence-   
   s-a-flawed-construct-study-says/   
   >>   
   >   
   > Extremes again. This is silly. Humans can and should be allowed to enjoy   
   > “pristine” nature so long as they leave it as they found it and a balance   
   > needs to be maintained between the number of people and nature.   
   > Pristine means “not disturbed by man”. And aboriginal peoples need not be   
   > displaced as they say because their culture is one of conservation and   
   > protection of nature.   
   >   
      
   ahh yes, julian the sack sad of shit really gives a fuck of ecological   
   biodiversity...   
      
   i'll take "things that'll never happen" for 420 pts   
      
   --   
   hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)