From: tsm@fastmail.ca   
      
   dart200  wrote:   
   > On 2/22/26 11:20 AM, Tara wrote:   
   >> Julian  wrote:   
   >>> A new study argues that the concept of a “pristine wilderness” that’s   
   >>> free from human inhabitants is a failing Eurocentric concept that may be   
   >>> used to expand conservation areas, a concern the U.N. special rapporteur   
   >>> on human rights and the environment reiterates in a policy brief about   
   >>> the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. The displacement of   
   >>> Indigenous peoples and local communities from such landscapes for   
   >>> conservation purposes may have adverse impacts on the ecosystem’s   
   >>> integrity and lead to the degradation of biodiversity...   
   >>>   
   >>> https://earth.org/pristine-wilderness-without-human-presence   
   is-a-flawed-construct-study-says/   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Extremes again. This is silly. Humans can and should be allowed to enjoy   
   >> “pristine” nature so long as they leave it as they found it and a   
   balance   
   >> needs to be maintained between the number of people and nature.   
   >> Pristine means “not disturbed by man”. And aboriginal peoples need not   
   be   
   >> displaced as they say because their culture is one of conservation and   
   >> protection of nature.   
   >>   
   >   
   > ahh yes, julian the sack sad of shit really gives a fuck of ecological   
   > biodiversity...   
      
   No   
      
      
   >   
   > i'll take "things that'll never happen" for 420 pts   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)