From: spam@nospam.com   
      
   On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:28:26 -0800, sms wrote:   
      
   > Sadly, none of the companies are requiring vaccination for all   
   > employees, just certain employees. What's especially disappointing is   
   > that they're not requiring employees in their retail stores to be   
   > vaccinated since that's where the public interacts, in person, with   
   > their employees.   
      
   Steve,   
      
   This is a (related) opinion piece on your post, bearing in mind I have   
   higher degrees in this stuff, and nobody else here likely does (which means   
   you don't know one billionth of what I know about this Covid thing).   
      
   And yet you _think_ you know enough to tell _others_ how to think.   
   That's the problem with this procedure being politicized due to fear.   
      
   I get it you're deathly afraid of your own shadow, Steve.   
   I get it _all_ the Democrats are (apparently) driven purely by fear, Steve.   
      
   Me?   
   I'm driven by facts and logic.   
      
   Not fear.   
   I run the math when I have to calculate whether I should get the shot.   
   (And, I know what is in that shot which is nothing like a polio vaccine!)   
      
   I don't expect you to understand what I'm going to summarize below as you're   
   a purely-fear-driven Democrat to the core, where it's obvious I'm neither a   
   Democrat nor a Republican because I think for myself (they don't tell me how   
   to think, Steve, and neither do you).   
      
   Here's how the Democrats think:   
    Democrats on some medical procedures: It's my body, my choice.   
    Democrats on other medical procedures: It's not my body nor my choice.   
      
   What's the difference?   
   Answer: Fear.   
      
   Democrats don't fear abortions (which is the death of an innocent child).   
   But Democrats fear a coronavirus (which most people are immune to).   
      
   It's OK by the way that you Democrats are driven by fear & not by logic.   
   As long as you keep your slogans straight Steve.   
    It's either my body my choice... or it's not, Steve.   
      
   Which is it?   
   Is it my body or not Steve?   
      
   You tell me because you are a Democrat who claims it is my body from one   
   side of your mouth, and then on the other side of your mouth you claim that   
   it is not my body at all.   
      
   This duplicity in the Democrats (who don't even believe their own   
   propaganda) is a problem because _nothing_ from politicians can be believed   
   if they can't even keep their slogans from contradicting each other.   
      
   FACTS (and logical assessments of those facts):   
   a. This "shot" does not even strictly meet CDC definitions of a "vaccine".   
   b. This "shot" is _clearly_ not needed by most people (more than 60%).   
   c. Certainly for kids (whose immune systems are naive) it's even less!   
   d. The chance of any one person dying from Covid in the USA is 0.2%   
   e. That _includes_ the very sick and the very old already in that number.   
   f. The chance of a kid (5-11) dying from Covid in the USA is 0.002%.   
   g. That means any one person has a 99.998 (kids) to 99.8% chance of living.   
   h. However, the chance of getting "infected" is nearly 100% (essentially).   
   i. And the chance of passing it on during that phase is also nearly 100%.   
   j. The chance of "feeling sick" is about %40 once you are infected.   
   k. Back to the shot, the chance of dying from the shot itself is neglibible.   
   l. And the shot doesn't give you chips or anything crazy that people say.   
   m. The shot is either mRNA or RNA spliced onto DNA of a zoonotic adenovirus.   
   n. That causes your cells to explode after making tons of one spike protein.   
   o. That spike protein itself is toxic to your body but it's in low amounts.   
   p. Because it's toxic (it damages vascular tissue) your body reacts to it.   
   q. Your body makes an assemblage of attack vehicles, some of which are Ab.   
   r. The antibodies don't last all that long with a high titre unfortunately.   
   s. Nobody knows exactly how long so we are doomed to boosters (forever?).   
   t. It's no different with the full-blown disease in that respect though.   
   u. But what _is_ different from full-blown disease are the attack vehicles.   
   v. The attack vehicles are _vastly_ more complex with a full-blown disease.   
   w. Which means our response under inevitable senescence will be _different_.   
   x. I believe when we get older, our immune system will "go to hell" quickly.   
   y. Then those with a shot (a simpler response) will have _less_ protection.   
   z. While those with the disease (more complex) will have _more_ protection.   
      
   I ran out of letters so that's all the one-line facts/assessments you get.   
   --   
   Adults can't disagree with facts (facts are funny that way); but adults can   
   logically disagree with my assessments of facts (adults are funny that way).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)