Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.business    |    Business related discussions (no ads)    |    27,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 26,160 of 27,547    |
|    Leroy N. Soetoro to All    |
|    [Trump roadkill...] CNN's collapse is no    |
|    08 Feb 22 05:21:23    |
      XPost: alt.att, alt.politics.trump, sac.politics       XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns       From: democrat-criminals@mail.house.gov              https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/592969-cnns-collapse-is-now-complete              It all began 42 years ago — Ted Turner's creation of a 24/7 news network       that would exist on something called cable TV. Few believed it could       succeed.              And, for its first decade, CNN largely chugged along but wasn't seen as a       game-changer or ?a true competitor to big broadcast news entities based in       New York in the form of CBS, NBC and ABC. That all changed when war broke       out between the United States and Iraq in 1991.              On the night war exploded over Baghdad, CNN was the only news organization       that was able to broadcast from the city under siege as the U.S. onslaught       began, all courtesy of the CNN team’s ability to convince the Iraqi       government to grant them a line out of the city to broadcast?, one that       the competition could not secure.              "How CNN Won the War" was the glowing headline from The Washington Post on       a story that perfectly chronicled the events that led to CNN officially       becoming a major player. And off it went.              Until 2002, CNN was ?No. 1 in the cable news race. But competition that       hadn't existed before ended its dominance forever, primarily in the form       of Fox News and, to a lesser extent, MSNBC. Despite the ratings results,       CNN continued to carry itself as a credible, facts-first network of       integrity that leaned heavily on solid reporting with a sprinkling of       opinion and infotainment mixed in via programs such as "Larry King Live"       and "Crossfire."              In 2013, the network hired former NBC Universal President Jeff Zucker to       take the reins as ratings continued to be below average at best. This gave       Zucker a mandate to radically change the network from its journalistic       roots of more than three decades — the months-long wall-to-wall coverage       of a missing Malaysian airliner being an early example.              But two years later, the move to insert heavy doses of partisan opinion       into its news reports only accelerated when former President Trump — a       Zucker hire at NBC for "The Apprentice" — jumped in to the 2016       presidential race. At first, CNN bear-hugged Trump's every move. (Hillary       Clinton's giving a speech somewhere? Screw it. Let's show an empty Trump       podium with chyrons stating "Trump to speak soon" instead.) The real       estate mogul's 17 Republican challengers never had a shot; Trump blotted       out the sun in terms of media coverage ?on his way to winning the       nomination.              At that point, Zucker and CNN began to worry. Because while it was a       ratings boon for the network to make Trump the centerpiece, there was       growing concern that the guy could actually beat Hillary and become the       nation's 45th president. So Zucker unleashed the hounds, but it was too       late. Trump would go on to shock the world in November 2016.              Undeterred, CNN decided there would be no honeymoon period for the new       president. Talk ?about Russian collusion handing Trump the White House       began even before the inauguration. And after the nonstop Trump-bashing,       Harvard University concluded that CNN led the way, along with Zucker's       former home of NBC, in giving Trump 93 percent negative coverage in his       first 100 days.              For the next four years, CNN served as the leading media resistance to       Trump, throwing objectivity out the window. And after President Biden got       elected, the network cheered the new president as it had throughout the       entire campaign while still making Trump a prime centerpiece for over-the-       top negative coverage despite ?his being out of office.              But as much as CNN tried to resurrect its lead character — who was banned       from social media and largely off the grid for the year — his absence       ?clearly showed the network was a one-trick partisan pony. Ratings fell 90       percent overall when comparing January 2021 to January 2022. That’s hard       to do.              Which brings us to the events of this week: Zucker released a statement       saying he had to resign because of a consensual affair with an executive       named Allison Gollust. WarnerMedia apparently has a rule against this, so       Zucker — instead of a slap on the wrist for a benign offense — simply had       to go abruptly.              Nobody believed this excuse. Turns out they may have had plenty of reason       to be skeptical.              Per several reports, Zucker and Gollust allegedly advised then-New York       Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) – the older brother of then-?CNN anchor Chris Cuomo       — on what to say during his COVID-19 daily briefings in the spring of       2020. They also reportedly told Cuomo how to respond to and how to       criticize Trump, to make it more compelling TV. (Gollust is a former       communications director for Andrew Cuomo.)              Let's unpack all of this:              In the spring of 2020, the country was in a horrific place. Businesses       shut completely; people were scared. There were no COVID-19 therapeutics,       no vaccines. Hospitals ?were overwhelmed, thousands were dying ?each day.       If ?ever there was a time for news organizations to educate and inform the       public, this was it.              Instead, Zucker apparently believed it was the perfect time to exploit the       situation for political gain and to help the network's ratings.              Andrew Cuomo benefited from briefings that made him? appear to be the       adult in the room ?regarding COVID-19 and Trump ?appear to be the villain.       ?Cuomo got a $5.1 million book deal as a result.              Chris Cuomo and Zucker/Gollust/CNN benefited from marathon interviews with       ?Cuomo's governor/brother, which didn't touch the governor's alleged       nursing home scandal. Ratings soared.              So, was Zucker's departure ?simply about a consensual relationship with a       co-worker? One might be forgiven for questioning that.              Moving forward, what's next for CNN when the company falls under the       Discovery Channel umbrella later this year? Let's hear from its soon-to-be       largest shareholder, John Malone of Liberty Media.              "I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it       started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and       refreshing," Malone said in an interview that recently aired on CNBC.              Andrew Yang in now-deleted tweet: 'I don't think Joe Rogan is a...       The collapse of CNN is now complete: 9 out of 10 viewers, gone. Its top-       rated anchor, ?Chris Cuomo, gone. Its network president, gone. Its       integrity in shambles.              ?Oh, and new management coming in that is signaling big-time changes ...       changes that may bring CNN back to the proud network it once was before       Jeff Zucker destroyed it.              Joe Concha is a media and politics columnist and a Fox News contributor.                     --       "LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections       recover with no after effects.              No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.       Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca