Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.business    |    Business related discussions (no ads)    |    27,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 26,387 of 27,547    |
|    Leroy N. Soetoro to All    |
|    San Francisco Braces for Epic Commercial    |
|    12 Sep 22 22:51:18    |
      XPost: misc.invest.real-estate, alt.politics.economics, alt.heal       h.virus.cure.alternatives       XPost: sac.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns       From: democrat-criminals@mail.house.gov              https://sfstandard.com/business/san-francisco-braces-for-epic-commercial-       real-estate-crash/              Imagine a slow-moving train coming towards you. The lights are shining,       the horn is blaring, but it’s just far enough in the distance that the       risk doesn’t seem real just yet.              That’s a fitting-enough analogy for the state of San Francisco’s       commercial real estate market, which is tilting towards a collapse in       property values, leaving the city, its budget and its ability to provide       services tied to the tracks.              The root of this—of course—is the pandemic and the way that it has       completely transformed work patterns in the city, hollowing out a downtown       core that once accounted for most of San Francisco’s GDP, 70% of its sales       tax revenue and 40% of the city’s jobs. And there’s an uneasy feeling       among a coalition of business groups that city leaders are sleepwalking       into an economic calamity with far-reaching consequences.              Signal lights of the city’s tenuous fiscal future are starting to flash.       Major tech employers like Yelp and Airbnb have fled or gone fully remote,       leading to mass office vacancies. A swath of commercial landlords are       seeking massive reductions in their assessed property values—and       associated tax bills. And a recent report from the Urban Displacement       Project ranked the city’s downtown recovery as dead last among more than       60 cities across North America.              ‘Uncharted Territory’       It’s no secret that office vacancies are high in SF’s downtown. But even       as the pandemic wanes, an already-troubling outlook for downtown could       only get worse.              That’s because a slew of office leases signed at the height of the city’s       economic boom are poised to expire over the next few years, further       inflating vacancies and diminishing what the office towers that draw the       city’s skyline are worth. There’s currently more than 25 million square       feet of commercial space available for lease or sublease in the city, the       equivalent of about 35 Transamerica Pyramids sitting empty.              “We’re way above anything that was happening in the Great Recession and       dot-com era days,” said Jay Shaffer, a co-founder and principal at Colton       Commercial & Partners. “We have this shadow market of sublease       availability in seemingly uncharted territories. And sublease inventory is       still rising.”              Citing data from real estate firm JLL, SF’s chief economist Ted Egan       tagged future vacancies, in a worst case scenario, as high as 53% in the       Jackson Square area and 43% in the mid-Market area in 2024 as the clock       runs out on office leases.              The current vacancy epidemic cuts across buildings of all sizes and price       ranges in San Francisco’s downtown core, from the struggling mid-Market       area to the sparkling office towers of the East Cut.              For example, 415 Natoma, a 653,900 sq foot office tower owned by       Brookfield Properties that was the sole ground-up office project to       deliver in San Francisco in 2021, currently has just one announced lease:       20,000 square feet taken by “remote-first” startup Thumbtack. Nearby       office towers 123 Mission (Juul Labs, Inc.), 50 Fremont (Salesforce.com,       Inc.) and 199 Fremont (CalSTRS) were each at least 30% vacant, according       to CoStar data, along with a constellation of other big office buildings.              A few large buildings, like 550 California St. and 455 Market St, were       placed on the market in recent months at deep discounts to what they would       have fetched before the pandemic, but were eventually pulled when offers       came in that were even lower than those already-discounted prices.              In the case of 550 California St., a downtown office tower owned by Wells       Fargo, bids came in at 60% to 70% under what the building would have sold       for in 2019, real estate brokers said.              Zombie Buildings       The risk of a San Francisco real estate collapse is palpable enough that       it’s caught the attention of at least one Wall Street hedge fund—and not       in a good way.              Dan McNamara, founder of New York hedge fund Polpo Capital, became known       for the lucrative short bets he made against regional malls run into the       ground by e-commerce and Amazon.              Now, McNamara is eyeing the commercial office market for another short       bet, and San Francisco is near the top of his list. McNamara started his       firm last year to take advantage of what he considers to be mispricings in       the commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) market.              “We thought there was a unique opportunity to take advantage of the       impending distress within the commercial real estate market,” McNamara       said. “San Francisco has been an amazing example of this; we’ve had all       these tech companies that have been driving office space usage for the       past 20 years. But we believe that’s changed forever.”              A report published in November by the Institute of Taxation and Economic       Policy (ITEP) calculated that San Francisco could see a short-term decline       in commercial property values of up to 43%, the highest projected in the       study.              The logic is obvious: San Francisco’s software-dominant economy pivoted       easily away from offices during the pandemic, and has little incentive to       return.              In some ways, the city is a victim of its own success by creating an       economic model so heavily dependent on tech in the aftermath of the Great       Recession, said Wade Rose, president of the business advocacy group       Advance SF.              “We initiated the growth of an economic sector that could pivot on a       dime,” Rose said. “So they closed down fast and exposed this       vulnerability.”              Lenders have taken a dim view of the office market and that’s doubly true       for slow-to-recover San Francisco, leaving fewer options for refinancing.              “It's frozen,” McNamara said of current market conditions. “I do believe       San Francisco is the most challenging office market today partly due to       the fact they became oversupplied very quickly when the model changed to       hybrid.”              The properties most at risk are mid- to lower-tier buildings purchased       near the peak of the market. Commercial real estate insiders say that       those property owners are negotiating with lenders to avoid foreclosure,       but that it may be sooner rather than later before the dam starts to       break.              McNamara sees refinancing issues leading to defaults, delinquencies and a       class of unoccupied “zombie-type buildings.” That may be already starting       to happen.              Of the some 200 large properties identified by CoStar as “high vacancy,”       at least three have defaulted on their 2021 property tax bills, according       to a city tax database. Those include a property at 25 Taylor St. formerly       occupied by the coworking firm WeWork, and a 1182 Market St. property       formerly owned by the local real estate giant Shorenstein Properties.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca