Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.business    |    Business related discussions (no ads)    |    27,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 26,569 of 27,547    |
|    Leroy N. Soetoro to All    |
|    The True Dangers of Long Trains (4/5)    |
|    03 May 23 18:13:36    |
      [continued from previous message]              as a credit card. They’d come 1 millimeter, Walls said, from disaster.              The U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee took note of       the derailment and asked the Government Accountability Office to study the       safety and impacts of long trains. The committee’s two ranking members       hadn’t even signed the letter before CSX derailed another long train in       Georgia, just two months after Hyndman.              It was 2.4 miles long, and like the Hyndman train, a bulk of its tonnage       had been loaded in the rear. When the engineer began to brake, the back of       the train slid forward and shoved a car ahead of it off the tracks on a       curve, and 13 other cars followed. One car crashed into a home and the       person inside was rushed to a hospital. The man survived. CSX did not       comment on this accident but did tell ProPublica the company is committed       to operating safely and is constantly evaluating its rules, specifically       on train handling. See what else it said about its safety practices here.              It was only after all of this happened that the FRA, in March 2018,       replied to the union officials who had expressed concerns that previous       spring. In a letter, the agency said it “began looking at the length of       trains as a potential contributing cause of FRA reportable       accidents/incidents” in 2016. The agency still did not have “the       sufficient data or evidence to justify an Emergency Order limiting the       length of trains.”              In May 2019, the GAO completed its study, coming to a similar conclusion:       long trains may be dangerous, but more information was needed. Its effort       was partly stymied, the GAO said, because most rail companies refused to       hand over enough of their private train-length data to allow investigators       to make findings. The FRA also told ProPublica it has asked companies for       this data but never gotten it.              On Thursday, the FRA told ProPublica it is starting the process of       requiring companies to disclose the train length for every reportable       accident, a move prompted by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.       But there is no guarantee the regulators will succeed. The FRA said it       first needs to publish a notice of the new data-collection effort and       ultimately the Office of Management and Budget would need to approve the       measure.              Had the FRA issued an emergency order as the union requested in 2017, a       rare and extreme step, the railroads would have likely gotten a judge to       block it, said Cothen, author of the white paper on longer trains. He       acknowledged that most of the long trains in the country arrive at their       destinations without incident, but he feels the railroads are operating       with an unreasonable degree of risk. He believes the FRA has the evidence       it needs to start crafting a rule to limit train lengths, a process that       would include input from the industry. “My issue to this point,” Cothen       said, “has been that effective action has not been taken.” The FRA says it       disagrees.              Across the country, worried state lawmakers have tried to cap the lengths       of trains that roll through their communities. Since 2019, in Arkansas,       Iowa, Kansas, Georgia, Nebraska, Washington, Arizona and other states,       lawmakers have proposed maximum lengths of 1.4 to about 1.6 miles. But       every proposal has died before becoming law. Opponents, which include       Class 1 railroad companies, claim that the efforts are driven by unions to       create jobs and that the proposals would violate interstate commerce laws.              Georgia state Sen. Rick Williams, a Republican, attempted to work around       this angst by offering a simple resolution last year that would have urged       the FRA to limit train length. Even that died. “It’s frustrating,” he       said, “when you see something that happens, like in East Palestine, Ohio,       and you know it very easily could happen here and we could suffer the same       consequences.”              Democratic Arizona state Rep. Consuelo Hernandez’s bill to limit train       length was approved by two committees this session with bipartisan       support. But Republicans refuse to put the bill on the floor for a general       vote, and so it has stalled. ProPublica spoke with her the day after a       1.9-mile-long BNSF train derailed there. “The train companies are so       powerful,” Hernandez said. “What it comes down to is public safety versus       corporations.”              Many states have passed laws that would punish railroads for blocking road       crossings, but that power, state courts rule every time, rests solely with       the federal government.              At any moment, Congress could intervene and limit the length of trains. If       it did, independent experts say, there’d be more trains, moving faster       with fewer breakdowns and derailments, and customer service would improve.       But the rail companies, which move 40% of the country’s cargo, have a lot       of leverage. For more than a century, the industry has convinced lawmakers       that the success of America is tied to the success of the rails; it’s a       view that persists today, sustained by the $10 million the Association of       American Railroads spends some years lobbying Congress.              So long trains have continued jumping the tracks.              In June 2019, one month after the inconclusive GAO study, a 2.2-mile-long       Union Pacific train derailed in Nevada. It was so long and the terrain so       mountainous that at times sections of the train climbed uphill while other       sections climbed downhill, which made driving it a nightmare. Ultimately       the engineer couldn’t manage it, and the train lifted a car up and dropped       it on the ground. Twenty-seven cars followed.              In July, a 2.5-mile-long Union Pacific train derailed for the same reasons       elsewhere in Nevada.              In August, a 1.6-mile-long Union Pacific train going 48 miles an hour       derailed in Texas. The company ran computer simulations after the crash       and concluded it never should have been operating the long train at that       speed at that spot on the tracks.              In September, Union Pacific crashed yet another long train. It was 1.5       miles long and broke in two in Illinois. Half of the train rolled out of       control away from the other half. It then slowed, stopped and began       rolling back. The two halves collided and exploded. The fire spread       underground through a storm drain and ignited a holding pond at a chemical       plant. More than 1,000 residents and at least 1,000 schoolchildren were       evacuated.              And then in October, in separate instances, Norfolk Southern derailed two       long trains, both in Georgia. One was 2 miles long. The engineer had       struggled to control it, and his use of the brakes caused the rear of the       train to run into the front and lift a car off the tracks. The other train       was 1.6 miles long. Its autopilot had the brakes applied in the front and       the engine in the middle giving it gas, and as it reached the bottom of a       hill the opposing forces popped 32 cars off the tracks. They ruptured a       pipeline, which released nearly 2.3 million gallons of natural gas.              The following summer, in June 2020, a 2.3-mile-long Union Pacific train       derailed in Idaho because it was too big, the FRA determined. It was       constructed unevenly with 34 empty cars coupled near the front and loaded,       heavy cars behind them. The heavy cars pushed the light cars off the       tracks. The FRA also determined the engineer lacked the training necessary       to operate a train of that length.              In July 2020, a 2-mile-long BNSF train derailed in Arizona for similar       reasons: a long block of heavy cars coupled behind a set of empty cars       squeezed them off the tracks.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca