Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.business    |    Business related discussions (no ads)    |    27,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 26,725 of 27,547    |
|    Harry Kunte to All    |
|    'Holy grail of the labor market': Linked    |
|    10 Aug 23 00:39:45    |
      XPost: soc.retirement, talk.politics.guns, alt.machines.cnc       XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns       From: nowomr@protonmail.com              >       >https://finance.yahoo.com/news/holy-grail-labor-market-linkedin-       >180000671.html              Ayn Rand never worked a day in her Russian life.              Stupid Trump was easily outwitted by President Biden. Trump is of low       intelligence.               Looming indictment wrenches open the central question of 2024: Is Trump       fit to serve?              Privately, the fear is that a third indictment, even if it’s the most       serious one yet, will once again help Trump.       Donald Trump stands at a podium on stage as a red light flashes across his       face.              Early responses suggest the GOP field remains uncomfortable going after       Donald Trump directly over Jan. 6, but, instead, would attack him around       the edges. | Giorgio Viera/AFP/Getty Images              By Adam Wren and Natalie Allison              07/18/2023 07:36 PM EDT              Updated: 07/18/2023 09:21 PM EDT              Donald Trump’s announcement on Tuesday that he expects to soon be a       thrice-indicted candidate is forcing GOP candidates to fully contend with       the fundamental question of the 2024 presidential primary.              Is the former president fit to reoccupy the office?              The early responses suggest the field remains uncomfortable going after       Trump directly over Jan. 6, but, instead, would attack him around the       edges.              In South Carolina, Ron DeSantis said Trump “should have come out more       forcefully” as rioters ransacked the Capitol, but added that it fell short       of criminal activity. Vivek Ramaswamy told POLITICO in a statement he       “would have made very different judgments than President Trump did” on       Jan. 6. And Nikki Haley said the rest of the primary is threatening to be       drowned out by Trump’s legal “drama.”       DeSantis says Trump 'didn't do anything' to stop Jan. 6              The answers represented at least a small crack in the deference that some       previously courteous candidates had shown to Trump following his earlier       two indictments. But only a small one. And privately, the campaigns were       skeptical that even those modest attacks would have any impact other than       benefiting Trump himself.              “Jan. 6 just gins up the base,” said a strategist working for a Trump       rival.              Critics of the former president were left to wonder what it would take for       the field to actually turn on him over Jan. 6, if a “target letter”       informing Trump he was about to be indicted for his behavior around that       day didn’t do the trick.              “This is the kabuki dance they’re going to be doing for months — it ain’t       going to be the first time and it ain’t going to be the last time,” said       Mike Madrid, the Republican strategist and co-founder of the anti-Trump       Lincoln Project. “The kabuki dance is trying to have it both ways while       they try to wait for dust to settle on his legal problems.”              Nearly a month before the first debate, the actions of Special Counsel       Jack Smith’s grand jury has candidates hurtling toward a Rubicon they’ve       not fully found a way to navigate: To assail Trump’s character as       exhibited in the lead up to and on Jan. 6 or not.              Trump’s former vice president, Mike Pence, dealt with the matter head on       in his announcement speech last month in Iowa, saying Trump “demanded”       that he “choose between him and our Constitution,” and adding that “anyone       who asked someone else to put them over the Constitution should never be       president of the United States again.”              And former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson went further than his past remarks       about Trump’s first and second indictments, declining to pad his       statements with references to “presumption of innocence” and the need to       “wait on the facts.”              “While Donald Trump would like the American people to believe that he is       the victim in this situation,” Hutchinson said in a written statement,       “the truth is that the real victims of January 6th were our democracy, our       rule of law, and those Capitol Police officers who worked valiantly to       protect our Capitol.”              Chris Christie, the former New Jersey governor, slammed Trump as well,       saying his “conduct on January 6th proves he doesn’t care about our       country & our Constitution,” regardless of what the latest case shows.       Christie bashes Trump: CNN town hall moments              But aside from that trio, the rest of the field is landing in a proverbial       no-man’s land on the question of Trump’s conduct on Jan. 6. Their       reticence underscores how hard they continue to believe it is to hit Trump       without looking squishy to the base.              DeSantis experienced that firsthand. Following his gentle criticism that       Trump “should have come out more forcefully” on Jan. 6, the Florida       governor was saddled by longtime Trump adviser Jason Miller with a new       derisive moniker: “Ron DeCheney,” a reference to former Rep. Liz Cheney,       the Republican vilified by the rank-and-file after co-leading the Jan. 6       committee.                     Republican operatives have internalized the idea that to question Trump’s       innocence related to Jan. 6 is to invite the wrath of his base. And though       the expected indictment’s focus on Trump’s actions surrounding Jan. 6       would appear to give them ground to stand on, it’s unclear that line of       attack is swaying primary voters.              “If you’re looking for an anti-Trump lane, it’s a fool’s errand,” said       Madrid. “You’re looking for the fountain of youth. It doesn’t exist. What       you may be trying to do is hoping that you can occupy a lane that opens up       if he is put on trial and thrown in jail before the election.”              Republican consultants working to support Trump’s primary rivals didn’t       immediately see Tuesday’s news as a defining moment in the race. The       previous indictments already boosted Trump’s fundraising and rallied GOP       voters to his side.              “It seems like each indictment has only gotten him more support,” said a       senior adviser to a rival campaign who was granted anonymity to discuss       campaign dynamics.              The adviser added that this likely forthcoming indictment is far more       serious than the first two. But absent further details from Smith himself,       it’s unclear what the political fallout would be.              “If it looks more like New York, then he will get a bump out of it,” said       another GOP consultant granted anonymity to discuss the dynamics of the       race, in reference to the indictment over alleged hush money payments to a       porn actress. “But if [the DOJ] handles it like the other indictment in a       professional way and they have a lot of backup, I think he is likely to       suffer — but not a ton of damage.”              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca