XPost: misc.legal, alt.education, alt.politics.democrats   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.society.liberalism   
   From: yourdime@outlook.com   
      
   CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — On a campus already bitterly divided, the statement   
   poured acid all over Harvard Yard.   
      
   A coalition of more than 30 student groups posted an open letter on the   
   night of the Hamas attack, saying that Israel was “entirely responsible”   
   for the violence that ended up killing more than 1,400 people, most of   
   them civilians.   
      
   The letter, posted on social media before the extent of the killings was   
   known, did not include the names of individual students.   
      
   Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times   
      
   But within days, students affiliated with those groups were being doxxed,   
   their personal information posted online. Siblings back home were   
   threatened. Wall Street executives demanded a list of student names to ban   
   their hiring. And a truck with a digital billboard — paid for by a   
   conservative group — circled Harvard Square, flashing student photos and   
   names, under the headline, “Harvard’s Leading Antisemites.”   
      
   Campuses have long wrestled with free speech. What is acceptable to say   
   and what crosses into hate speech? But the war between Israel and Hamas   
   has heightened emotions, threatening to tear apart already fragile campus   
   cultures.   
      
   Complicating it all: outside groups, influential alumni and big-money   
   donors, who are putting maximum pressure on students and administrators.   
      
   At the University of Pennsylvania, donors are pushing for the resignation   
   of the president and the board chair, after a Palestinian writers’   
   conference on campus invited speakers accused of antisemitism.   
      
   At Harvard, a billionaire couple quit an executive board. Another donor   
   pulled money for fellowships. And Lawrence Summers, a former Harvard   
   president and Treasury secretary, criticized the leadership for a   
   “delayed” response to the Hamas attack and the student letter.   
      
   This is not the first time that Harvard students have taken up an   
   unpopular view. But those involved with the letter had not anticipated   
   that their statement would go viral and unleash such repercussions.   
      
   The students had to contend with “people’s lives being ruined, people’s   
   careers being ruined, people’s fellowships being ruined,” one student   
   whose organization signed the letter said in an interview.   
      
   Many critics have little forbearance for these complaints, saying that the   
   letter itself showed a lack of empathy. But other students and free-speech   
   activists say that the outside pressure has created its own kind of   
   heckler’s veto, dictating what can be said on campus and how institutions   
   must respond.   
      
   “You kind of feel like you’re responsible” for the harassment, said one of   
   the Harvard students, whose family’s personal information was released.   
   “That’s how silencing works, right?”   
      
   The Letter and Its Aftermath   
      
   Last week, in a bland conference room on the campus, four student leaders   
   in the pro-Palestinian movement — three women and a man, all   
   undergraduates — sat nervously around a table. A kaffiyeh, a checkered   
   scarf that has become a symbol of Palestinian solidarity, was tossed on a   
   chair.   
      
   They were not Palestinian, they said, but activists for marginalized   
   people.   
      
   The groups that signed the letter often worked together in a kind of   
   informal support network, the students said. When one championed an issue,   
   the others might sign on in a show of collegiality.   
      
   They had agreed to be interviewed but insisted on anonymity, saying that   
   they feared for their safety. They asked that even the smallest details of   
   their personal lives — freshman? senior? — not be published.   
      
   They have been avoiding publicity since posting their letter on Facebook   
   and Instagram on the night of Oct. 7, hours after the attack.   
      
   As the world increasingly focused on Hamas’ trail of terror in Israel,   
   their letter opened with the line: “We, the undersigned student   
   organizations, hold the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all   
   unfolding violence.”   
      
   After the letter went viral, and anger against it erupted, some of the   
   groups distanced themselves from the message.   
      
   Attention has now shifted to Israel’s ongoing retaliation and the toll on   
   civilians in the Gaza Strip, and these students are sticking with their   
   stance, although they said it has been wearing.   
      
   One of the women found out from a friend about the billboard truck. It was   
   parked just outside the university gates, plastered with a giant image of   
   her smiling face. Customers sitting at a pastry shop, students looking out   
   of their dormitory windows and commuters rushing to and from the train   
   station could see her, along with a carousel of other students, being   
   branded as antisemitic.   
      
   “I threw up in Harvard Yard,” she said.   
      
   The truck is operated by Accuracy in Media, a conservative group that has   
   also deployed such trucks at other campuses, including Stanford and the   
   University of California, Berkeley.   
      
   “It’s ironic that students on the campus where Facebook was invented are   
   shocked that their names are publicly available,” said Adam Guillette,   
   president of Accuracy in Media. “We’re merely amplifying their message.”   
      
   The group is not done. It has purchased domain names for Harvard students   
   associated with the letter and is setting up individual websites for them.   
   Each site will call for the university to punish the students.   
      
   Students’ names were also exposed last week through a website featuring a   
   “College Terror List, a Helpful Guide for Employers” compiled by Maxwell   
   Meyer, a 2022 Stanford graduate.   
      
   Meyer, 23, said in an interview that his information had come from public   
   sources and tips sent to an email address. He said he had no affiliation   
   with Accuracy in Media.   
      
   His website was removed by Google and Notion, the note-taking app where it   
   was displayed, Meyer said. (The students said alumni had helped remove   
   it.) But other sites have picked up the list and passed it around.   
      
   Meyer said that as a former editor of the conservative Stanford Review, he   
   was a defender of free speech. “At one point, I defended critics of Israel   
   against what I called right-wing cancel culture,” he said.   
      
   But “if you’re a member of an organization that advocates terrorism in   
   your name, you aren’t just a sitting duck, you’re a person with agency,”   
   he said. “You can say, ‘I disavow this.’ These are Harvard students we’re   
   talking about. They need to be held to a higher standard.”   
      
   Bill Ackman, the hedge fund billionaire and Harvard alumnus, wrote on   
   social media that the names of students should be circulated, to avoid   
   “inadvertently” hiring them. His more than 800,000 followers boosted   
   Meyer’s website, and led dozens of chief executives to ask for the list,   
   Meyer said.   
      
   In another social media post, Ackman said he was “100% in support of free   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)