[continued from previous message]   
      
   college and seminary papers; he lied in his books; he lied when   
   he said he fired Communists on his payroll; he lied when he said   
   that twice as many blacks died in Vietnam than whites. Hoover   
   was right.   
      
   King was a plagiarist: King stole from others all his lifetime   
   as was supported by King’s people in Atlanta! “King’s plagiarism   
   was a general pattern evident in nearly all of his academic   
   writings….We found that instances of textual appropriation can   
   be seen in his earliest extant writings as well as his   
   dissertation. The pattern is also noticeable in his speeches and   
   sermons throughout his career.” Note King’s family excused his   
   plagiarism calling it “textual appropriation.”   
      
   King’s biographer David J. Garrow states: “King’s academic   
   compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost   
   without exception little more than summary descriptions…and   
   comparisons of other’s writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost   
   always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting   
   that King’s professors did not expect more….” Why did they not   
   expect more? It is a fact that King stole 66% of his Ph.D.   
   dissertation! It seems Boston University wanted to give a   
   doctorate to an unqualified and dishonest man, therefore played   
   the game.   
      
   In his seminary papers, King reproduced the research and   
   writings of others but he also incorporated their many errors,   
   grammatical as well as theological!   
      
   King was a phony: In another paper King wrote that “the orthodox   
   view of the divinity of Christ is in my mind quite readily   
   denied.” He other papers King denied Christ’s virgin birth and   
   vicarious death and visible return of Christ. Martin Luther King   
   was an unbeliever! He was a phony preacher and phony Christian!   
      
   What would be the reaction if a national holiday were suggested   
   to honor a man, even a good man, who had past ties with the Klan   
   or Nazis? Would it not be expected that everyone would demand   
   that he answer some questions and his life be looked at very   
   closely? Why is King an exception? And why are conservatives   
   playing this game of whitewashing King’s reputation? Obviously,   
   truth is unimportant.   
      
   To sum up: There is no argument. As usual, I’ll be accused of   
   racism but it’s only the facts. King was a pinko, a philander, a   
   pervert, a prevaricator, a plagiarist and a phony. That doesn’t   
   bother most people but it does bother honest people.   
      
   http://gbctroyny.com/mlk.html   
                
      
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)