Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.business    |    Business related discussions (no ads)    |    27,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,091 of 27,547    |
|    Leroy N. Soetoro to All    |
|    [Your money is our money...] Ignoring pu    |
|    08 Mar 24 21:38:32    |
      XPost: misc.industry.utilities.electric, alt.politics.democrats,       alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics, talk.politics.misc       From: democrat-criminals@mail.house.gov              https://sfstandard.com/2024/03/07/pge-cpuc-rate-hike-utilities-costs/              After nearly two hours of vociferous—at times enraged—opposition to       planned PG&E rate hikes during a meeting of the California Public       Utilities Commission on Thursday, commissioners took five minutes to issue       their decision.              The regulators would allow PG&E to raise rates. Again.              The new fees will stack on top of already historic hikes that went into       effect in January and averaged 13%—around $414 in additional annual       fees—for the typical PG&E electricity and gas customer.              That sticker shock will be compounded by an average of $4-$6 in additional       monthly fees for the typical ratepayer approved by the California Public       Utilities Commission. Those hikes, intended to cover the costs incurred by       the company for wildfire mitigation and infrastructure modernization, will       take effect in April.              Public commenters at the commission meeting in downtown San Francisco were       uniformly against the rate increases, with chants of “Stop the rate       hikes!” and “No rate hikes!” breaking out. Some referred to the utility’s       recent record revenues—its earnings statement released last week reported       profits of $2.24 billion for 2023, a nearly 25% year-over-year increase.              “This rate increase is to cover last year's cost overrun,” said Mary Zhu,       84. “It is a rush to judgment, and a company with $15 billion in the bank       is not entitled to charity.”              The increases were greenlighted without any specific discussion by the       five CPUC commissioners, and the vote went so quickly that several       activists missed that the decision even happened. "Did the vote happen?”       asked one attendee who stepped out of the room briefly.              Since early 2021, PG&E bills in California have increased by 38%—an       average of $52 per month, according to regulatory filings—20% more than       the rise in the consumer price index over the same period.              The recent increase in rates means that PG&E has now leapfrogged San Diego       Gas & Electric as the state’s priciest power provider.              But the bad news for ratepayers doesn’t end there: rates could continue       their dramatic rise in 2024. PG&E has a pending application to raise       monthly rates a further $14 a month starting later this year to recover       costs from damage caused by last year's storm season.              Much of the criticism from public commenters on Thursday was lobbed at the       five commissioners themselves, who were accused of passing through       additional costs to consumers in deference to corporate interests.              The five members of the Public Utilities Commission are appointed to their       positions by the governor and are confirmed by the state senate to a six-       year term. All current commissioners were appointed by Gov. Gavin Newsom       and most have held public service positions focused on energy policy.              “We reject the premise that the name of your body is the Public Utilities       Commission; it’s more like the private utilities commission or the       property utilities commission,” said activist Gloria La Riva, 69.              The rate hikes date back to an application filed by PG&E last year to       recover nearly $2.5 billion in costs, including some $688 million that the       company said it spent on wildfire safety work, electrical system       modernization and gas line safety work.              “Delaying the recovery of costs could negatively impact our ability to       secure competitive finance rates and increase the costs for capital       investments,” PG&E spokesman Mike Gazda said in a statement.              An administrative law judge approved the recovery of up to $516 million in       expenses, citing the need to preserve the utility company’s credit rating       and “effectively manage” the rate impacts for customers.              Rate increases are “appropriate in order to stabilize PG&E’s still       precarious financial position,” Administrative Law Judge Camille Watts-       Zagha wrote in her preliminary decision published March 4.              Members of the public angrily pushed back on concerns about the company’s       finances.              “You five who are all unelected and can make decisions for millions and       millions of people,” said San Francisco resident Richard Becker, 77. “You       have stood on the side of PG&E and other utilities as they’ve reaped       billions in profits.”              “We're opposing this. It’s outrageous, especially with a $2.24 billion       profit,” said Mark Toney, the executive director of The Utility Reform       Network, which filed an official objection to the rate hike.              PG&E leaders have said the company has reduced its physical and financial       risk in the wake of a 2019 bankruptcy filing caused by its role in deadly       and destructive wildfires across California in 2017 and 2018.              The company officially exited bankruptcy in 2020. In January, PG&E       restarted payment of its quarterly dividend, a portion of profits paid out       to shareholders.                     --       We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that       stupid people won't be offended.              Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.              No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.       Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.              Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden       fiasco, President Trump.              Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the       The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood       queer liberal democrat donors.              President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed       dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca