Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.business    |    Business related discussions (no ads)    |    27,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,136 of 27,547    |
|    Ken to Biden stupid...    |
|    Re: The big flaw in Biden's billionaire     |
|    07 Apr 24 05:51:24    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, misc.taxes, alt.politics       XPost: sac.politics       From: Ken@invalid.com              Biden stupid... wrote:       > Joe Biden and his administration are fiscally incompetent and ignorant.       >       > President Biden wants to raise taxes on Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and their       > cohort of Americans, who are amassing extraordinary wealth that is not       > taxable under current law.       >       > Biden says his plan would make the system more fair — but experts say       it       > lacks practicality.       >       > The president wants to impose a minimum 25% tax on all Americans with       > assets over $100 million. The “billionaire tax†would impact the       10,700       > wealthiest Americans and generate an estimated revenue of $400 billion       > over 10 years.       >       > The idea of levying higher taxes on those at the top of the economic       > ladder is not new. Yet the latest proposal raises more questions than       > answers.       >       > “Are you taxing the rich? Are you taxing the wealthy?†Peter       Ferrigno,       > director of tax service at Henley & Partners, a citizenship investment       > consulting firm, told Yahoo Finance. “They're very similar, but they       are       > not the same thing.†      >       > Furthermore, the proposed policy challenges a fundamental principle of       > the US tax code, which treats money earned as income differently from       > wealth generated through valuation growth.       >       > How could the US government tax wealth?       > Biden hasn’t offered many specifics, but to get to a minimum 25% rate,       > experts say he would have to tax unrealized gains — unsold profits       from       > increases in asset values — as part of billionaires’ income.       Under       > current law, unrealized gains aren’t taxed until the asset is sold at       a       > profit.       >       > The president says this is the proper way to calculate the true income       â€”       > and true tax rate — of the ultra-wealthy. Billionaires make the bulk       of       > their money through stock or investment growth instead of a wage from a       > 9-to-5 job. So, the president says, they shouldn’t be able to shelter       > income simply because they haven’t pocketed the profits.       >       > “Billionaires don't often have a typical paycheck,†Brandon       Zureick,       > managing director and portfolio manager at Johnson Investment Counsel,       > told Yahoo Finance.       >       >       > That may sound like a lot, but Musk’s true tax rate amounted to only       > 3.79%. By contrast, the median American household earned $70,800 in 2021       > and paid an average tax rate of 15%.       >       > Under Biden’s proposal, Musk’s tax bill would have totaled $3       billion       > for 2018 through 2022 — nearly seven times higher than what he paid.       >       > The 25 wealthiest Americans paid $13.6 billion in federal income taxes       > from 2014 to 2018. Meanwhile their wealth collectively increased by $401       > billion in that same period, ProPublica reported. This means their       > collective average true tax rate was 3.4%.       >       >       > In other words, how will the taxes work when investment values decline       > on paper?       >       > “When you start taxing unrealized gains rather than realized gains,       > you're going down a very slippery slope,†Ferrigno said. “You       want to       > tax the going up? Are you going to give money back when they go down       > again?†      >       > For instance, if Musk’s share in Tesla (TSLA) surges from $100 billion       > to $200 billion, Biden’s proposed wealth tax would cost Musk $25       billion       > in that year — 25% of the unrealized $100 billion gain. But if Tesla       > shares declined by $100 billion the next year, would the government need       > to pay Musk back?       >       > “That's where you open up a whole reason that other countries don't do       > this,†Ferrigno said. “Income tax has been around for centuries.       And the       > reason no one's ever done this is because it's practically imp       actical.†      >       >       > Top 1% pays nearly half of US tax       > Opponents of a wealth tax reason that the share of federal taxes paid by       > the top 1% is already adequate. In 2021, the top 1% paid over $1       > trillion, almost half of all tax revenue collected, according to the Tax       > Foundation.       >       > “The income tax system in the United States is highly progressive and       > redistributive,†Erica York, senior economist at the right-leaning       think       > tank Tax Foundation and author of its latest report on income tax data,       > told Yahoo Finance. The top 10%, she added, paid almost 76% of all tax       > revenue.       >       > Critics also note that there is already a separate income tax on the       > rich, making Biden’s proposal redundant and unnecessary.       >       > The alternative minimum tax (AMT) is a parallel system that sets a floor       > on what high-income individuals must pay. It removes some benefits and       > deductions on their tax returns, limiting the reductions to their tax       > liabilities.       >       > “The US has had the alternative minimum tax for about 50 years,†      > Ferrigno said. “They already have a tool in the toolbox to try and       > address [taxes on high incomes].†      >       > Ferrigno said an update to the AMT would be sufficient in taxing       > billionaires’ incomes.       >       >       > But he said the Biden administration should start with a lower tax rate       > on billionaires, like 10%, and progress from there before landing at       > 25%.       >       > After all, levying an overwhelming wealth tax on the super rich, who are       > also super mobile, can backfire. A number of billionaires left Norway in       > 2022 after the country implemented a 1.1% capital asset tax on married       > households with equity over the equivalent of $3.7 million.       >       > “Find out what works and import it and avoid what Norway did to drive       > half of [ultra-wealthy] away,†Ferrigno said. “Look at how Spain       has a       > high enough threshold that people just grudgingly accept it.†      >       > Spain has a long-standing regional wealth tax from 0.16% to 3.5%. But       > instead of emigration, wealthy Spaniards either accepted their wealth       > tax rate or relocated to a cheaper region within the country.       >       > “[Spain’s wealth tax] has been there for a long time as well,       so people       > are used to it,†Ferrigno said. “Plus the exemptions ensure that       few       > people get into the highest brackets.†      >       > Switzerland also assesses various wealth taxes at the regional level on       > individuals’ assets worldwide, including bank account balances,       > equities, boats, and airplanes.       >       > Transformative technology, such as blockchain ledgers and artificial       > intelligence, is transforming financial systems, yet the US tax codes              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca