XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, sac.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 15:41:06 -0500, super70s   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 2025-08-02 13:06:31 +0000, NoBody said:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 01 Aug 2025 07:17:31 -0400, NoBody  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:43:32 -0500, super70s   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> In article ,   
   >>>> Mitchell Holman  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Governor Swill  wrote in   
   >>>>> news:3ael8khtrts481aqtaip8a388qe6bpjv15@4ax.com:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 02:51:12 -0000 (UTC), "P. Coonan"   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 28 Jul 2025, pothead  posted some   
   >>>>>>> news:1068mkk$2ad4v$3@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28, super70s  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28 10:29:51 +0000, Larry Parker said:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> American Eagleâ•Â˙s stock is soaring after the retailer   
   ditched   
   >>>>>>>>>> its "woke" marketing misstep and returned to a straightforward,   
   >>>>>>>>>> pro-America ad campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney. When the brand   
   >>>>>>>>>> first adopted identity politics and featured an overweight model in   
   >>>>>>>>>> an attempt to check woke boxes, sales and stock took a hit, proving   
   >>>>>>>>>> once again that going woke often means going broke. But as soon as   
   >>>>>>>>>> American Eagle refocused on classic, relatable American values and   
   >>>>>>>>>> popular culture icons, the market responded positively, showing   
   >>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>>>> customers want quality and connection, not virtue signaling.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2025/07/27/popular-   
   >>>>> clothing   
   >>>>>>>>>> -   
   >>>>>>>>>> store-stock-soars-after-ditching-woke-ads-for-pro-america-campaign-   
   >>>>> n2   
   >>>>>>>>>> 660923   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Their Aerie sub-brand discontinued using supermodels to encourage   
   >>>>>>>>> postitive self-image and they sponsor programs to spread awareness   
   >>>>>>>>> about eating disorders. But never mind any positive actions taken by   
   >>>>>>>>> companies to help their customers be psychologically and physically   
   >>>>>>>>> healthy.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You and "townhall.com" really have a bad case of WDS (Woke   
   >>>>>>>>> Derangement Syndrome).   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Yawn.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Do you think Rosie O'Donnel in a bikini is going to sell more   
   >>>>>>>> bikini's? How about Ru Paul in a Corvette commercial?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That being said, I do agree that more average people should be used   
   >>>>>>>> in commercials especially those aimed at younger people.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Still the bottom line is sales.   
   >>>>>>>> Ask Jaguar how their move to woke went for them.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Waving hand, let's ask Stellantis how Jeep is doing under their woke   
   >>>>>>> "luxury" remake and price increases.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The price increases are probably the more relevant issue.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> All the US car companies have been   
   >>>>> losing sales in the Trump economy.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Car sales plummet following pre-tariffs   
   >>>>> panic buying: "The party is over"   
   >>>>> July 1, 2025   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://nypost.com/2025/07/01/business/car-sales-plummet-following-pre-   
   >>>>> tariffs-panic-buying-the-party-is-over/   
   >>>>   
   >>>> People aren't even considering new cars and their $50K price tag   
   >>>> anymore, they're going straight to the used market.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I understand the new strategy is "sneakflation," the price increases   
   >>>> will be introduced gradually.   
   >>>   
   >>> Under which President was the massive new car price inflation?  Why   
   >>> would Mitchie ramble about possible further increaes when he was   
   >>> silent about the massive inflation when it happened?   
   >>   
   >> Silence from "super..."   
   >   
   >B...b...b...but Biden.   
      
   Can't address what I said I see.   
      
   >   
   >But all that inflation (caused by COVID which Trump45 ignored and then   
   >denied in early 2020) was supposed to go away "on Day 1" Jan. 20, 2025   
   >wasn't it?   
      
   If it went away that would be deflation and you'd be whining about   
   that.  I never expected a lowering a prices but I understand what   
   Trump actually meant.   
      
   And you completely ran away from the point I made.  Not that I'm   
   shocked mind you...   
      
   >   
   >At least that's what suckers like you believed.   
      
   I already said that was not my expectation.   
      
   >   
   >Now Trump is firing people left and right who report economic numbers   
   >he doesn't like, it's "The Apprentice" but this time it's no silly game   
   >show.   
      
   I'm not on board with that action but as President he's entitled to   
   make his hires and fires.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)