XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, sac.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: NoBody@nowhere.com
On Sun, 03 Aug 2025 08:57:43 -0400, NoBody wrote:
>On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 15:41:06 -0500, super70s
> wrote:
>
>>On 2025-08-02 13:06:31 +0000, NoBody said:
>>
>>> On Fri, 01 Aug 2025 07:17:31 -0400, NoBody wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:43:32 -0500, super70s
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Governor Swill wrote in
>>>>>> news:3ael8khtrts481aqtaip8a388qe6bpjv15@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 02:51:12 -0000 (UTC), "P. Coonan"
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 28 Jul 2025, pothead posted some
>>>>>>>> news:1068mkk$2ad4v$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28, super70s wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28 10:29:51 +0000, Larry Parker said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> American Eagleâ•Â˙s stock is soaring after the retailer
ditched
>>>>>>>>>>> its "woke" marketing misstep and returned to a straightforward,
>>>>>>>>>>> pro-America ad campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney. When the brand
>>>>>>>>>>> first adopted identity politics and featured an overweight model in
>>>>>>>>>>> an attempt to check woke boxes, sales and stock took a hit, proving
>>>>>>>>>>> once again that going woke often means going broke. But as soon as
>>>>>>>>>>> American Eagle refocused on classic, relatable American values and
>>>>>>>>>>> popular culture icons, the market responded positively, showing
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> customers want quality and connection, not virtue signaling.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2025/07/27/popular-
>>>>>> clothing
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> store-stock-soars-after-ditching-woke-ads-for-pro-america-campaign-
>>>>>> n2
>>>>>>>>>>> 660923
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Their Aerie sub-brand discontinued using supermodels to encourage
>>>>>>>>>> postitive self-image and they sponsor programs to spread awareness
>>>>>>>>>> about eating disorders. But never mind any positive actions taken by
>>>>>>>>>> companies to help their customers be psychologically and physically
>>>>>>>>>> healthy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You and "townhall.com" really have a bad case of WDS (Woke
>>>>>>>>>> Derangement Syndrome).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yawn.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you think Rosie O'Donnel in a bikini is going to sell more
>>>>>>>>> bikini's? How about Ru Paul in a Corvette commercial?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That being said, I do agree that more average people should be used
>>>>>>>>> in commercials especially those aimed at younger people.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still the bottom line is sales.
>>>>>>>>> Ask Jaguar how their move to woke went for them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Waving hand, let's ask Stellantis how Jeep is doing under their woke
>>>>>>>> "luxury" remake and price increases.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The price increases are probably the more relevant issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the US car companies have been
>>>>>> losing sales in the Trump economy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Car sales plummet following pre-tariffs
>>>>>> panic buying: "The party is over"
>>>>>> July 1, 2025
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2025/07/01/business/car-sales-plummet-following-pre-
>>>>>> tariffs-panic-buying-the-party-is-over/
>>>>>
>>>>> People aren't even considering new cars and their $50K price tag
>>>>> anymore, they're going straight to the used market.
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand the new strategy is "sneakflation," the price increases
>>>>> will be introduced gradually.
>>>>
>>>> Under which President was the massive new car price inflation? Why
>>>> would Mitchie ramble about possible further increaes when he was
>>>> silent about the massive inflation when it happened?
>>>
>>> Silence from "super..."
>>
>>B...b...b...but Biden.
>
>Can't address what I said I see.
>
>>
>>But all that inflation (caused by COVID which Trump45 ignored and then
>>denied in early 2020) was supposed to go away "on Day 1" Jan. 20, 2025
>>wasn't it?
>
>If it went away that would be deflation and you'd be whining about
>that. I never expected a lowering a prices but I understand what
>Trump actually meant.
>
>And you completely ran away from the point I made. Not that I'm
>shocked mind you...
>
>>
>>At least that's what suckers like you believed.
>
>I already said that was not my expectation.
>
>>
>>Now Trump is firing people left and right who report economic numbers
>>he doesn't like, it's "The Apprentice" but this time it's no silly game
>>show.
>
>I'm not on board with that action but as President he's entitled to
>make his hires and fires.
And silence from "Super"....
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
