XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, sac.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: super70s@super70s.invalid
In article ,
NoBody wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Aug 2025 08:57:43 -0400, NoBody wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 15:41:06 -0500, super70s
> > wrote:
> >
> >>On 2025-08-02 13:06:31 +0000, NoBody said:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 01 Aug 2025 07:17:31 -0400, NoBody wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:43:32 -0500, super70s
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article ,
> >>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Governor Swill wrote in
> >>>>>> news:3ael8khtrts481aqtaip8a388qe6bpjv15@4ax.com:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 02:51:12 -0000 (UTC), "P. Coonan"
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 28 Jul 2025, pothead posted some
> >>>>>>>> news:1068mkk$2ad4v$3@dont-email.me:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28, super70s wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28 10:29:51 +0000, Larry Parker said:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> American EagleÃ∞¢Ã≠â•¢Ã≠Ë˙s stock is soaring
after the retailer
> >>>>>>>>>>> ditched
> >>>>>>>>>>> its "woke" marketing misstep and returned to a straightforward,
> >>>>>>>>>>> pro-America ad campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney. When the brand
> >>>>>>>>>>> first adopted identity politics and featured an overweight model
> >>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>> an attempt to check woke boxes, sales and stock took a hit,
> >>>>>>>>>>> proving
> >>>>>>>>>>> once again that going woke often means going broke. But as soon
> >>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>> American Eagle refocused on classic, relatable American values
> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> popular culture icons, the market responded positively, showing
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>> customers want quality and connection, not virtue signaling.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2025/07/27/popular-
> >>>>>> clothing
> >>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>> store-stock-soars-after-ditching-woke-ads-for-pro-
merica-campaign
> >>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>> n2
> >>>>>>>>>>> 660923
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Their Aerie sub-brand discontinued using supermodels to encourage
> >>>>>>>>>> postitive self-image and they sponsor programs to spread awareness
> >>>>>>>>>> about eating disorders. But never mind any positive actions taken
> >>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>> companies to help their customers be psychologically and
> >>>>>>>>>> physically
> >>>>>>>>>> healthy.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You and "townhall.com" really have a bad case of WDS (Woke
> >>>>>>>>>> Derangement Syndrome).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yawn.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do you think Rosie O'Donnel in a bikini is going to sell more
> >>>>>>>>> bikini's? How about Ru Paul in a Corvette commercial?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> That being said, I do agree that more average people should be used
> >>>>>>>>> in commercials especially those aimed at younger people.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Still the bottom line is sales.
> >>>>>>>>> Ask Jaguar how their move to woke went for them.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Waving hand, let's ask Stellantis how Jeep is doing under their woke
> >>>>>>>> "luxury" remake and price increases.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The price increases are probably the more relevant issue.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> All the US car companies have been
> >>>>>> losing sales in the Trump economy.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Car sales plummet following pre-tariffs
> >>>>>> panic buying: "The party is over"
> >>>>>> July 1, 2025
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://nypost.com/2025/07/01/business/car-sales-plumme
-following-pre-
> >>>>>> tariffs-panic-buying-the-party-is-over/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> People aren't even considering new cars and their $50K price tag
> >>>>> anymore, they're going straight to the used market.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I understand the new strategy is "sneakflation," the price increases
> >>>>> will be introduced gradually.
> >>>>
> >>>> Under which President was the massive new car price inflation? Why
> >>>> would Mitchie ramble about possible further increaes when he was
> >>>> silent about the massive inflation when it happened?
> >>>
> >>> Silence from "super..."
> >>
> >>B...b...b...but Biden.
> >
> >Can't address what I said I see.
> >
> >>
> >>But all that inflation (caused by COVID which Trump45 ignored and then
> >>denied in early 2020) was supposed to go away "on Day 1" Jan. 20, 2025
> >>wasn't it?
> >
> >If it went away that would be deflation and you'd be whining about
> >that. I never expected a lowering a prices but I understand what
> >Trump actually meant.
He got elected on promises to lower inflation and instead prices are
steadily rising, we're talking about what's going on 6 months forward
never mind his Day 1 bullshit.
> >And you completely ran away from the point I made. Not that I'm
> >shocked mind you...
I didn't run away from anything, inflation in the past 5 years was
caused by Trump who dropped the ball on COVID and came to a head in the
term of Biden who was doing something about it. Now Trump's tariffs have
only made everything worse.
> >>At least that's what suckers like you believed.
> >
> >I already said that was not my expectation.
> >
> >>
> >>Now Trump is firing people left and right who report economic numbers
> >>he doesn't like, it's "The Apprentice" but this time it's no silly game
> >>show.
> >
> >I'm not on board with that action but as President he's entitled to
> >make his hires and fires.
>
> And silence from "Super"....
He's entitled to put whatever toadies in he wants who tell him what he
wants to hear but the American people see through it. And feel the
results of prices continuing to rise no matter what kind of rosy figures
he puts out.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
