XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com   
      
   On Nov 28, 2025 at 10:30:14 PM MST, "pothead" wrote   
   <10ge0d6$3376c$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:   
      
   > On 2025-11-29, Governor Swill  wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:41:41 -0500, Collectivists_Always_Fail   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:22:55 -0500, Governor Swill   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 01:44:23 -0500, Collectivists_Always_Fail   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 21:54:46 -0500, Governor Swill   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 15:17:47 -0500, "Joel W. Crump"   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 11/23/25 2:54 PM, chine.bleu wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Joel W. Crump wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 11/22/25 5:14 PM, slothe wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> we'll do basic income, to alleviate the scarcity of   
   >>>>>>>>>>> employment for these people.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> The areas where it would be most needed can't afford it from the tax   
   >>>>>>>>>> revenue available.  The best option would be to create jobs.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> If Elon Musk could build a 10,000,000 square foot auto factory and   
   have   
   >>>>>>>>>> it running in less than a year - he did, the same red tape cutting   
   could   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> What could go wrong with that?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> be applied to other industries to create jobs.  Green energy and   
   climate   
   >>>>>>>>>> crap need not apply.  Machinists, cad / cam and robotic techs   
   preferred.   
   >>>>>>>>>> If Japan can use remote workers controlling robots to restock 7-11   
   >>>>>>>>>> orders, why can't the US follow suit?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I'm not opposed to job creation.  But it has yet to solve this basic   
   >>>>>>>>> problem.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> And did the Countenance Divine,   
   >>>>>>>> Shine forth upon our clouded hills?   
   >>>>>>>> And was Jerusalem builded here,   
   >>>>>>>> Among these dark Satanic Mills?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> We should want our privilege to be extended to the rest of the world.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> That's how I was educated.  From grade school we were taught that as   
   >>>>>> Americans, we had a duty to share our system of government with the   
   >>>>>> rest of the world.  To teach them that free enterprise was better than   
   >>>>>> centrally planned economies.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> We've done that, and now, the same conservatives that taught us to do   
   >>>>>> that are horrified that we now have competition.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Isn't competition the calling card of conservative economics?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Indeed... Competition drives improvement.  We just re-evaluated our   
   >>>>> health insurance and switched to one that served our needs better.   
   >>>>> Thank goodness that we're not locked into non-competitive government   
   >>>>> health insurance....   or grocery stores...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Exactly.  Pity we now have economic competition from so many   
   >>>> countries.   
   >>>   
   >>> It's good that we''re moving back to competing....   
   >>   
   >> Then why the tariffs?  Don't they artificially contaminate the market?   
   >>   
   >> Why do you shift your opinion depending on the subject being   
   >> discussed?   
   >>   
   >> "Competition is good until somebody gets better at it than we are."   
   >   
   > There should be fair trade policies and up until Trump trade was highly   
   biased   
   > against   
   > the US.   
   > In a fair market the buyers get to choose and poor products will   
   > not last while those in demand will.   
   > The problem is that other countries have been taking advantage of   
   > the US for a long time and this needs to stop.   
   > For example China has been manipulating their currency for years.   
   > That may be unstoppable but the US should encourage manufacturing   
   > to relocate to the US.   
   >   
   > Personally I'm against this "my tariff is bigger than yours" approach   
   > but something needs to be done. Tariffs can be a bargaining point   
   > to at least get a dialog going.   
   >   
   > It's complex.   
      
   Trade with the U.S. has long been complex, but it's misleading to say it was   
   "highly biased against the U.S." before Trump. U.S. tariffs have historically   
   been low compared to many countries, and U.S. exports often benefit from   
   strong demand abroad.   
      
   Claims that China has been manipulating its currency are partly true -- there   
   were periods, especially before 2015, when China actively kept the yuan   
   undervalued to support exports -- but the IMF has noted that in recent years   
   China's currency policy has been more market-driven.   
   Encouraging domestic manufacturing is a policy choice, but tariffs are a blunt   
   tool: studies from the Peterson Institute and the National Bureau of Economic   
   Research show that tariffs often raise costs for U.S. businesses and consumers   
   more than they force foreign companies to change behavior.   
      
   --   
   It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with   
   you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)