Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.business    |    Business related discussions (no ads)    |    27,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,514 of 27,547    |
|    Pelosi Goes To prison to All    |
|    Record $9.6 million fine for Third Coast    |
|    06 Jan 26 10:21:17    |
      XPost: sci.geo.petroleum, tx.politics, sac.politics       XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns       From: noreply@mixmin.net              Pipeline safety regulators on Monday assessed their largest fine ever       against the company responsible for leaking 1.1 million gallons of oil       into the Gulf off the coast of Louisiana in 2023. But the $9.6 million       fine isn’t likely to be a major burden for Third Coast to pay.              This single fine is close to the normal total of $8 million to $10       million in all fines that the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety       Administration hands out each year. But Third Coast has a stake in some       1,900 miles of pipelines, and in September, the Houston-based company       announced that it had secured a nearly $1 billion loan.              Pipeline Safety Trust Executive Director Bill Caram said this spill       “resulted from a company-wide systemic failure, indicating the       operator’s fundamental inability to implement pipeline safety       regulations,” so the record fine is appropriate and welcome.              “However, even record fines often fail to be financially meaningful to       pipeline operators. The proposed fine represents less than 3% of Third       Coast Midstream’s estimated annual earnings,” Caram said. “True       deterrence requires penalties that make noncompliance more expensive       than compliance.”              The agency said Third Coast didn’t establish proper emergency       procedures, which is part of why the National Transportation Safety       Board found that operators failed to shut down the pipeline for nearly       13 hours after their gauges first hinted at a problem. PHMSA also said       the company didn’t adequately assess the risks or properly maintain the       18-inch Main Pass Oil Gathering pipeline.              The agency said the company “failed to perform new integrity analyses or       evaluations following changes in circumstances that identified new and       elevated risk factors” for the pipeline.              That echoed what the NTSB said in its final report in June, that “Third       Coast missed several opportunities to evaluate how geohazards may       threaten the integrity of their pipeline. Information widely available       within the industry suggested that land movement related to hurricane       activity was a threat to pipelines.”              The NTSB said the leak off the coast of Louisiana was the result of       underwater landslides, caused by hazards such as hurricanes, that Third       Coast, the pipeline owner, failed to address despite the threats being       well known in the industry.              A Third Coast spokesperson said the allegations were a shock because the       company “consistently meets or exceeds regulatory requirements across       our operations.”              “After constructive engagement with PHMSA over the last two years, we       were surprised to see aspects of the recent allegations that we believe       are inaccurate and exceed established precedent. We will address these       concerns with the agency moving forward,” the company spokesperson said.              The amount of oil spilled in this incident was far less than the 2010 BP       oil disaster, when 134 million gallons were released in the weeks       following an oil rig explosion, but it could have been much smaller if       workers in the Third Coast control room had acted more quickly, the NTSB       said.              https://www.ocregister.com/2026/01/05/us-gulf-pipeline-leak-fine/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca