Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.c64    |    Putting Jack Tramiel on a big pedestal    |    4,524 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,434 of 4,524    |
|    Sam Gillett to Didimo    |
|    Re: Jack Tramiel at CHM - Dec. 10 !!!    |
|    22 Oct 07 03:04:23    |
      XPost: comp.sys.cbm, rec.games.video.classic       From: sgillettnospam@diespammergte.net              "Didimo" wrote ...       >       > Sam, don't act like the stereotype of the computer nerd with no social       > skills, no sense of humor and no perception of the difference between       > reality and what people write on a silly newsgroup.       > A 44-y-o college prof would not throw tomatoes for real, EVEN to jack       > scumbag tramiel and his scumbag son.              Some college professors crave media attention almost as much as Brittney       Spears does. To some professors the headline "College Professor Throws       Rotten Tomatoes at Computer Museum Guest Speaker" might look pretty good.       How was I to know that you are not one of those?              > Can you say "figure of speech"?       > Maybe you can. Try.              Can you say, "Jack Tramiel is not a scumbag!"       Maybe you can. Try real hard now...              BTW, if I understand correctly, the management at Atari had put game consoles       on back burner long before Tramiel arrived. The folks at Atari were already       trying to emulate the success of Commodore by putting everything into       computers.              When Jack arrived at Atari he spearheaded the development of the ST so that       Atari would have something to compete with the new flagship of Commodore, the       Amiga. Without the ST and Jack's leadership Atari would have folded years       before it did.              Never mind that Commodore stole the Amiga from Atari. That was not Jack's       fault as it happened _after_ he left Commodore. Blame Irving Gould.              If Jack can be blamed for the death of Atari, it is not because of anything       he did at Atari. It would be because he made Commodore, especially the       Commodore 64, so successful before leaving Commodore.              Jack left Commodore because of disagreements with Irving Gould. Jack Tramiel       was the brains and brawn behind Commodore. However, Irving Gould was the       money behind Commodore. Irving owned the company, or at least controlling       interest, so Jack was the one that left.              Jack Tramiel is good.       Irving Gould was evil.              Can you say that?       --       Best regards,              Sam Gillett              Change is inevitable,       except from vending machines!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca