8b767bf2   
   XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.showbiz.gossip   
   From: Roofshadow2004@nospam.yahoo.com   
      
   In article <1169504461.516203.281250@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
    WarriorWoman_500@yahoo.com wrote:   
      
   > Agent Smith wrote:   
   > > "subscriber1997"  wrote in   
   > > news:45b44b53$0$5245$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:   
   > >   
   > > >   
   > > >  wrote in message   
   > > > news:1169433604.711171.221290@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...   
   > > >>   
   > > >> WarriorWoman_...@yahoo.com wrote:   
   > > >>> subscriber1997 wrote:   
   > > >>> > "BarebackBill"  wrote in message   
   > > >>> > news:u028r21v6ts3unaj5u7qqqk5trnnv9i4tp@4ax.com...   
   > > >>> > > On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:27:04 -0500, "subscriber1997"   
   > > >>> > >    
   > > >>> > > wrote:   
   > > >>> > >   
   > > >>> > >>> No such thing as an air-tight prenup once a couple has kids.   
   > > >>> > >>   
   > > >>> > >>   
   > > >>> > >>=============   
   > > >>> > >>   
   > > >>> > >>sure there are 'air-tight' contracts   
   > > >>> > >>good pre-nups anticipate ALL possible   
   > > >>> > >>and some impossible eventualities ....   
   > > >>> > >   
   > > >>> > > Nonsense.   
   > > >>> > > You can't write kids into a prenup. They aren't dogs.   
   > > >>> >   
   > > >>> > ============   
   > > >>> >   
   > > >>> > please   
   > > >>> > as in all contracts and or agreements   
   > > >>> >  future possibilities can and ARE   
   > > >>> > delineated ............dogs kids etc. etc.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>> _____________________________   
   > > >>> You are wrong.  You can protect your financial assets from the point   
   > > >>> you get married.  After that point everything is negotiable.  You   
   > > >>> think you're so smart and you're not.  Your are a webber for gosh   
   > > >>> sakes.   
   > > >> _____________________   
   > > >> And in case you didn't get that, look at what Paul McCartney's ex   
   > > >> will be walking away with 80 million.  Get a life.   
   > > > ===================   
   > > >   
   > > > i can't be irritated by the invincible ignorance   
   > > > of dull witted posters ..........................   
   > >   
   > > I never expected *this* to happen.  It's not my words that are being   
   > > used by the angry opposition, but my style.  In my whimsy, Oh Lord, what   
   > > havoc have I wrought?   
   > >   
   > > In fairness, though, if the pre-nup is so ironclad, the fight should   
   > > already be over.  Saying that the pre-nup is ironclad doesn't make it   
   > > so, counsellor.  If Federline's got half a brain, which he apparently   
   > > does, he'll drag this thing out as long as he possibly can, because the   
   > > endless stream of bad news is his only ticket to fame.  When the divorce   
   > > is final, he'll immediately dissolve into obscurity.   
   > >   
   > > All he needs is a reliable supply of his own crafty villainy, as well as   
   > > greedy lawyers, driven by gamblers' fantasies of a chance at of   
   > > Britney's billions.  In Hollywood, none of those commodities are   
   > > lacking, and KeV's only limitation will be his tolerance for stress,   
   > > with all the medical and psychological problems it causes, including   
   > > over-spending.   
   > >   
   > > C'est la guerre.  :[~   
   > __________________________________   
   > I believe it was air-tight.  But bad mother that Brit has been, no   
   > telling what might happen if they go to a jury trial.  Wearing no   
   > undies, getting drunk on countless of ocassions.  Dropping the baby,   
   > etc.   
      
   Not to mention almost dropping the baby on the pavement while keeping a   
   rock solid grip on the tumbler of vodka in her other hand - shows you   
   where her priorities are!   
      
   I didn't really pay attention to all the antics.  She is better   
   > off to pay K-Fed a much larger sum than she decided.  She is young and   
   > has many years ahead of her to earn millions more.   
      
   Not if she keeps doing stuff like she's been doing recently - although   
   being a narcissistic skank whore with absolutely no redeeming qualities   
   whatsoever has been working for Madonna for nearly thirty years now so   
   what do I know?   
      
   Of course if he   
   > does not settle for a reasonable amount, he may wind up with a lot less   
   > than he was offered in settlement.   
   >   
   > Same thing with the Beattle.  There should have been no probs, but no   
   > prenup.  Also,  I think Paul may be physically abusive.  He does not   
   > want that dragged thru the court.   
      
   It honestly wouldn't surprise me... but we don't know the whole story.   
      
   Sorry if I gave my opinion and it   
   > wasn't asked for.   
      
   This is a public newsgroup - you're free to give your opinion whether   
   it's solicited or not!   
      
   )   
      
   --   
   Roofshadow   
      
   AUK FNG   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)