8b767bf2   
   XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.showbiz.gossip   
   From: agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com   
      
   Roofshadow  wrote in   
   news:Roofshadow2004-193B1A.20330822012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com:   
      
   > In article <1169504461.516203.281250@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
   >  WarriorWoman_500@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >   
   >> Agent Smith wrote:   
   >> > "subscriber1997"  wrote in   
   >> > news:45b44b53$0$5245$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:   
   >> >   
   >> > >   
   >> > >  wrote in message   
   >> > > news:1169433604.711171.221290@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...   
   >> > >>   
   >> > >> WarriorWoman_...@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >> > >>> subscriber1997 wrote:   
   >> > >>> > "BarebackBill"  wrote in message   
   >> > >>> > news:u028r21v6ts3unaj5u7qqqk5trnnv9i4tp@4ax.com...   
   >> > >>> > > On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:27:04 -0500, "subscriber1997"   
   >> > >>> > >    
   >> > >>> > > wrote:   
   >> > >>> > >   
   >> > >>> > >>> No such thing as an air-tight prenup once a couple has   
   >> > >>> > >>> kids.   
   >> > >>> > >>   
   >> > >>> > >>   
   >> > >>> > >>=============   
   >> > >>> > >>   
   >> > >>> > >>sure there are 'air-tight' contracts   
   >> > >>> > >>good pre-nups anticipate ALL possible   
   >> > >>> > >>and some impossible eventualities ....   
   >> > >>> > >   
   >> > >>> > > Nonsense.   
   >> > >>> > > You can't write kids into a prenup. They aren't dogs.   
   >> > >>> >   
   >> > >>> > ============   
   >> > >>> >   
   >> > >>> > please   
   >> > >>> > as in all contracts and or agreements   
   >> > >>> >  future possibilities can and ARE   
   >> > >>> > delineated ............dogs kids etc. etc.   
   >> > >>>   
   >> > >>> _____________________________   
   >> > >>> You are wrong.  You can protect your financial assets from the   
   >> > >>> point you get married.  After that point everything is   
   >> > >>> negotiable.  You think you're so smart and you're not.  Your   
   >> > >>> are a webber for gosh sakes.   
   >> > >> _____________________   
   >> > >> And in case you didn't get that, look at what Paul McCartney's   
   >> > >> ex will be walking away with 80 million.  Get a life.   
   >> > > ===================   
   >> > >   
   >> > > i can't be irritated by the invincible ignorance   
   >> > > of dull witted posters ..........................   
   >> >   
   >> > I never expected *this* to happen.  It's not my words that are   
   >> > being used by the angry opposition, but my style.  In my whimsy, Oh   
   >> > Lord, what havoc have I wrought?   
   >> >   
   >> > In fairness, though, if the pre-nup is so ironclad, the fight   
   >> > should already be over.  Saying that the pre-nup is ironclad   
   >> > doesn't make it so, counsellor.  If Federline's got half a brain,   
   >> > which he apparently does, he'll drag this thing out as long as he   
   >> > possibly can, because the endless stream of bad news is his only   
   >> > ticket to fame.  When the divorce is final, he'll immediately   
   >> > dissolve into obscurity.   
   >> >   
   >> > All he needs is a reliable supply of his own crafty villainy, as   
   >> > well as greedy lawyers, driven by gamblers' fantasies of a chance   
   >> > at of Britney's billions.  In Hollywood, none of those commodities   
   >> > are lacking, and KeV's only limitation will be his tolerance for   
   >> > stress, with all the medical and psychological problems it causes,   
   >> > including over-spending.   
   >> >   
   >> > C'est la guerre.  :[~   
   >> __________________________________   
   >> I believe it was air-tight.  But bad mother that Brit has been, no   
   >> telling what might happen if they go to a jury trial.  Wearing no   
   >> undies, getting drunk on countless of ocassions.  Dropping the baby,   
   >> etc.   
   >   
   > Not to mention almost dropping the baby on the pavement while keeping   
   > a rock solid grip on the tumbler of vodka in her other hand - shows   
   > you where her priorities are!   
   >   
   > I didn't really pay attention to all the antics.  She is better   
   >> off to pay K-Fed a much larger sum than she decided.  She is young   
   >> and has many years ahead of her to earn millions more.   
   >   
   > Not if she keeps doing stuff like she's been doing recently - although   
   > being a narcissistic skank whore with absolutely no redeeming   
   > qualities whatsoever has been working for Madonna for nearly thirty   
   > years now so what do I know?   
   >   
   > Of course if he   
   >> does not settle for a reasonable amount, he may wind up with a lot   
   >> less than he was offered in settlement.   
   >>   
   >> Same thing with the Beattle.  There should have been no probs, but no   
   >> prenup.  Also,  I think Paul may be physically abusive.  He does not   
   >> want that dragged thru the court.   
   >   
   > It honestly wouldn't surprise me... but we don't know the whole story.   
      
   I'm surprised that nobody has yet mentioned the question of drinking and   
   drugging while her youngest was still in utero, which I think is much   
   worse than almost dropping her oldest, but keeping a firm grip on her   
   martini.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)