XPost: alt.showbiz.gossip, alt.gossip.celebrities   
   From: agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com   
      
   "m~elizabeth"  wrote in   
   news:1pOAh.10434$JF.9567@newsfe21.lga:   
      
   >   
   > "Gossip Guy"  wrote in message   
   > news:1171483317.436107.26760@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...   
   > Wow, this is kind of a messed up move by the editors of Sports   
   > Illustrated. Models are already screwed up enough. We don't need to   
   > fuel their insecurities by putting a heavily airbrushed pop star like   
   > Beyoncé on the cover of their swimsuit issue. You just know somewhere   
   > there's a 107 pound supermodel crying her eyes out wondering if   
   > cutting out lunch will be good enough to get the cover next year. Her   
   > death will be on your hands Sports Illustrated.   
   >   
   > from: http://www.celebslam.com/beyonce-sports-illustrated   
   >   
   > I was surprised that she got the cover.  I thought SI was typically a   
   > model venue.   
   >   
   > Celebrities have taken over the covers of the majority, if not all,   
   > fashion magazines.  I used to love seeing Linda Evangelista, Christy   
   > Turlington, Paulina Porizkova, even Cindi Crawford, as the cover   
   > models.   
   >   
   > I hope SI goes back to swimsuit models next year.  I hate to see   
   > another cover given over to a celebrity.   
      
   It seems to be a new movement in modelling.  The halcyon days of those   
   girls you mentioned are behind us, and the new super models are   
   uninteresting lately.  The whole movement is is established, and the   
   Russian broads ruined the whole thing, anyhow.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)