89292749   
   XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: jollyroger@pobox.com   
      
   Paul M. Cook  wrote:   
   > On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 01:34:32 +0000, Jolly Roger wrote:   
   >   
   >> I said studies show it, and they do. You can disagree, but you would   
   >> easily be proven wrong since the studies are public knowledge.   
   >   
   > I realize you are emotionally attached to an indefensible position,   
      
   Nope. I'm not emotionally attached to anything in this discussion, and I   
   haven't given my opinion either. You're reaching as usual.   
      
   > although you may not be able to comprehend as much as he   
      
   More of your insults. I'm not surprised you stoop to insults as often as   
   you do..   
      
   >    Unfortunately, since it's impossible to compile accurate facts on   
   >    what accidents are caused by distracted drivers, we must make a   
   >    leap of faith to *assume* that a certain percentage of those owners   
   >    will actually be *using* those phones while driving.   
      
   I don't have to make any assumptions.   
      
   Your assertion that cell phone use correlates directly to accident rates   
   doesn't hold water.   
      
   > I don't expect you to actually comprehend what I wrote above   
      
   More cheap insults. You obviously have nothing more to contribute.   
      
   --   
   E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.   
   I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.   
      
   JR   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)