24d36d3d   
   XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: pmcook@gte.net   
      
   On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:54:55 -0500, (PeteCresswell) wrote:   
      
   > And the non-users just want to get rid of that behavior and embracing an   
   > idea that seems obvious (whether-or-not it's actually based on fact) is   
   > attractive.   
      
   You are correct.   
   This is what is occurring.   
      
   How many people still believe, to this day, that you get a "cold"   
   (aka a rhinovirus) from being in bad weather?   
      
   There are very many mistruths out there.   
      
   One of them is that cellphone use has any effect whatsoever on the   
   overall accident rate in the United States.   
      
   What I find interesting is that there are quite a few so-called 'studies'   
   which purport to show that cellphone use is extremely distractingly   
   dangerous.   
      
   So, it just goes to show that you can prove anything in a microcosm;   
   but it needs to stand the scrutiny of a bit of logic before it can   
   be believed.   
      
   Remember Linux Pauling's vitamin C studies?   
   Or cold fusion?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)