a0d0c741   
   XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: jollyroger@pobox.com   
      
   Paul M. Cook  wrote:   
   > On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 18:16:44 +0000, Chris wrote:   
   >   
   >> Your argument is full of assumptions placed upon data. There's   
   >> nothing wrong with the data, just your interpretation of   
   >> it.   
   >   
   > You're stating what's possible; not what's believable.   
      
   He's stating facts. You, on the other hand, are babbling foolish   
   conclusions based on erroneous assumptions.   
      
   > What nobody can find is any effect on the overall accident rate   
   > from that meteoric rise in cellphone ownership.   
      
   What you refuse to acknowledge is the fact that accident rates are   
   controlled by many factors UNRELATED to cell phone use, making your   
   argument INVALID.   
      
   You have failed.   
      
   --   
   E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.   
   I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.   
      
   JR   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)