Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,534 of 20,339    |
|    Paul M. Cook to chris    |
|    Re: Verizon finally allows wifi calling     |
|    10 Dec 15 22:44:08    |
      56da7e1a       XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android       From: pmcook@gte.net              On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:46:35 +0000, chris wrote:              > Why don't you reply to my points directly?              Chris,              Let's be blunt.              Your argument is preposterous that reason the overall accident rates       don't show any effect whatsoever from cellphone use is due to       (magically perfect) "hidden" factors.              If you truly believe the studies that *prove* [sic] that cellphone       use while driving is as dangerous as driving drunk would be, and       if you have the most basic inkling of how many people own cellphones       in the United States, then what you're intimating is preposterous.              You are, in effect, saying that everyone on the road who owns a       cellphone who is using that cellphone while driving is driving       as unsafely as a drunk driver would.              If that were even remotely true, the numbers of accidents that       would be happening would be catastrophically astoundingly huge.              That the accident rate shows nothing of the sort, you then try       to explain away as being "hidden" in the numbers.              Your argument is therefore patently preposterous, and, as a       result, is far beyond reasonable belief.              I grant you that your argument "can" happen, but the chances of       it happening, especially in light of the fact that you can't think       of a single factor that would hide such stupendous numbers, proves       beyond a doubt that you're simply grasping at straws.              You are beyond hope, and, since you wish to have the last word,       I will grant you your wish. But, I do hope that you realize what       it is that you're saying, because my argument is as plain as       Occams Razor, while yours requires a stupendously huge suspension       preposterously sized suspension of disbelief in order to carry       any weight.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca