XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: jollyroger@pobox.com   
      
   On 2015-12-11, Gordon Levi  wrote:   
   >   
   > Had you been able to read for comprehension you would have seen that   
   > there is a table in my reference based on a forensic study of motor   
   > vehicle accidents in Australia headed "MUARC study of 340 casualty   
   > crashes in VIC and NSW 2000-2011". You would have noted that the study   
   > supports your own conclusions that cell phone use is a minor   
   > contributor to accidents and is comparable to other driving   
   > distractions. If you were able to think logically you would not repeat   
   > your conclusion that a minor, but real, cause of accidents could be   
   > detected from gross accident statistics.   
   >   
   > If you were actually intelligent it would be obvious from your posts   
   > and you would not feel the need to tell us how intelligent you are.   
   > You might even realise that the examples you provide of your   
   > intelligence only show some rote learning of a science trivia quiz and   
   > simply underline your inability to reason.   
      
   Yup. He's a fool.   
      
   --   
   E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.   
   I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.   
      
   JR   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)