XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: jollyroger@pobox.com   
      
   Paul M. Cook  wrote:   
   > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:11:42 +1100, Gordon Levi wrote:   
   >   
   >> If you were able to think logically you would not repeat   
   >> your conclusion that a minor, but real, cause of accidents could be   
   >> detected from gross accident statistics.   
   >   
   > Ah, this is a good point, so, maybe you're *not* as dumb   
   > as I had thought you were.   
      
   You claim you are smarter than *anyone* who disagrees with your asinine and   
   flawed arguments.   
      
   > The erroneous leap of faith some of the people make here is   
   > that it makes any difference in the overall accident rate.   
   >   
   > It doesn't.   
      
   Bullshit. You have been shown the numbers that prove cell phone use does in   
   fact contribute to the overall accident rate but refuse to acknowledge them   
   because they don't fit your flawed narrative.   
      
   You seem to think if you just ignore them and repeat your asinine   
   assertions you can fool the rest of us into believing you over the facts,   
   but you are only fooling yourself. And fooling yourself seems to be very   
   easy. To the rest of us who know better, you are a big fool.   
      
   > The accidents don't exist   
      
   Another bald faced lie.   
      
   --   
   E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.   
   I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.   
      
   JR   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)