Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,611 of 20,339    |
|    Paul M. Cook to Rod Speed    |
|    Re: Verizon finally allows wifi calling     |
|    13 Dec 15 14:56:24    |
      e3723029       XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android       From: pmcook@gte.net              On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 06:43:41 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:              >> You can't even tell if the cellphone was being       >> *used* during an accident for a bunch of reasons       >       > You can actually if you know the time of the accident accurately              Think about that.              In order to know if a cellphone was being *used* at the time of the       accident, you need to know the time of the accident.              There are two *huge* problems with that information.              1. Nobody is holding a stopwatch during an accident, and it's        (possible, but) unlikely to find a watch or clock in the car        that suddenly stops at the time of the accident, so the time        of the accident is usually a guess (although, with OnStar        systems and GPS tracking, that guess can be better than a        guess by humans would likely be).              2. You have to narrow down the use of the mobile device which        is hard to do. For example, if someone was holding the phone        looking up a contact when the accident occurred, there would        be no record of that. Likewise, in a hundred other situations        using the cellphone, there would be no record of such use.              3. People lie.              4. The police don't subpoena the cellphone anyway, in most        accidents (and legally, they can't take it from you, even        if they take it when/if they arrest you, they still can't        look at it for evidence in the USA, as per the Supreme Court).              So, cellphone *use* which *causes* accidents (due to distraction)       is impossible data. Anyone who quotes what they feel is reliable       data on cellphone use during an accident is either a fool, or just       plain stupid, because that data just does not exist (and may never       exist).              It wouldn't be impossible to obtain, by the way, as GPS breadcrumbs       can be used to track the time of the accident, and *some* cellphone       use leaves a breadcrumb (e.g., texting and dialing); however, most       cellphone use leaves no breadcrumb (e.g., looking up contacts).              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca