98baad7e   
   XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android   
   From: pmcook@gte.net   
      
   On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 06:43:41 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:   
      
   > Doesn’t stop you proclaiming that cellphone use while   
   > driving isn't dangerous because you can't see any effect   
   > on the accident rate.   
      
   The onus isn't on "me" to determine if it's dangerous.   
   The onus is on those who proclaim it's dangerous.   
      
   If a fool is going to state that the use of cellphones while   
   driving is dangerous, don't you think they should supply a   
   single ounce of *reliable* data that backs that (erroneous)   
   claim up?   
      
   I'm not the one saying cellphone use is dangerous.   
   In fact, since there is absolutely no reliable evidence that it   
   is dangerous, I wouldn't expect to see *anything* different in   
   the reliable data.   
      
   Which is *exactly* what I see.   
      
   So, why do you ask "me" to prove what is already proved?   
   You need to ask the cellphone-is-dangerous crowd to prove what   
   *they* say. Mine is already proved by the data.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)