Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cellular    |    Devices for productivity & masturbation    |    20,339 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 18,629 of 20,339    |
|    Paul M. Cook to Rod Speed    |
|    Re: Verizon finally allows wifi calling     |
|    13 Dec 15 19:26:28    |
      409bcad9       XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android       From: pmcook@gte.net              On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:51:53 +1100, Rod Speed wrote:              > Because it isn't about OWNERSHIP.       >       >> You hate good data.       >       > You have no good data on CELLPHONE USE WHEN DRIVING.              Exactly my point!       My data matches perfectly!              The data doesn't match for those who claim that cellphone use is dangerous!              We all can agree the only good data we have is:       1. Accident rates, and,       2. Cellphone ownership.              We can all agree that the really bad data is:       3. Cellphone use while driving       4. Accidents related to cellphone use while driving              And, we may not agree, but it's clear to me the really bad data are       those so-called studies which *prove* [sic] that cellphone use while       driving is as dangerous as (name-your-most-headline-grabbing-disability).              So, finally you can see that the people who *claim* that cellphone       use while driving causes accidents have zero reliable data to back       up their claims.              Meanwhile, I claim nothing. Cellphone use or not use, ownership or       not ownership, doesn't matter one bit when you measure accident rates.              You may as well measure how many people wear green shirts, to compare       the effect with accident rates.              So, my proof is obvious. There is no effect whatsoever from cellphone       ownership or use since there is no effect on accidents.              The onus is not on me to show what the effect of cellphone ownership       or use is on accidents, since I can easily see that there is no       effect whatsoever.              It's those who *claim* there is an effect who need to produce       the data you seek, and, we know, they'll *never* be able to produce       that data.              Hence, they fall back on anecdotes and those so-called "studies".       Don't you see this? Or is it a whooosh for you too?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca